cmort666
Member
The way some of the anti-chambered round people talk, they'd carry a revolver with the hammer down on an empty chamber, even if it wasn't an SAA or clone.This is why I carry a revolver.
Ken
The way some of the anti-chambered round people talk, they'd carry a revolver with the hammer down on an empty chamber, even if it wasn't an SAA or clone.This is why I carry a revolver.
Ken
Without intensive training and continuous practice, this is untrue.
First, you're missing the simple fact that the knife must still be deployed. Will you have time to draw the knife and open it? Maybe. If you do, will you cut yourself in the process? Most likely.
I think, based on your assertion that drawing a gun is not the best idea at that point, that empty hand skills are better suited to that situation. Even so, I still think the gun is a better tool if there is a round in the chamber.
OK, ProtectedOne may not have said it, but I will. Present from concealment and put two shots on target in 1.3 seconds? Hmmm, that would be impressive. What distance? 7 yards? 3 yards?
I time myself as much as I can. At 7 yards I can present from concealment and put two rounds within a hand span of each other, in the thoracic cavity, in under 2.3 seconds consistently. My goal is less than 2 seconds. The absolute fastest I've done it was just under 2 seconds at about 1.98 seconds. I haven't been able to do it again.
From the ready I can get two, on target in under 1 second consistently at 5 yards, but that's not from concealment. That's a whole different ball game.
I've also timed a bunch of other people doing this same drill. I have yet to see anyone do it consistently under 2 seconds.
So, yes, I'm calling you out. I want corroboration. I'm not saying you can't do it. I'm just saying I want to see it. Don't get me wrong, I believe you. Shooting a controlled pair on target in 1.3 seconds is very impressive shooting. But I still want to see it.
I did not assert that drawing a firearm is the best or worst thing you can do. My point is - whatever you are going to try to employ, you are way to late. The key here is SA and if the attacker is that close and your radar isn't picking up the threat then you are already at a disadvantage. As far as cutting yourself - I agree, you better get the training and practice for an edged weapon. I would not rely on one weapon - handgun or edged - they are just tools, and the best tool you have is between your ears.
Does that mean that the only revolvers that should be carried are ones with a manual safety, like a Reichsrevolver?Keeping one in the pipe without a manual safety engaged or extensive firearms training is akin to building a home on a shoddy foundation.
Does that mean that the only revolvers that should be carried are ones with a manual safety, like a Reichsrevolver?
![]()
Does that mean that the only revolvers that should be carried are ones with a manual safety, like a Reichsrevolver?
![]()
Keeping one in the pipe without a manual safety engaged or extensive firearms training is akin to building a home on a shoddy foundation.
The only way to reduce a ND is through proper training, and a lot of it. Most people that carry do not have the proper training, so with that in mind, a manual operated safety or a heavier trigger pull will reduce the chance of a ND. It's asinine to disagree with that.
Keeping one in the pipe without a manual safety engaged or extensive firearms training is akin to building a home on a shoddy foundation.
If you don't trust yourself with one in the chamber then you shouldn't be carrying a gun.
But make that decision honestly.Your gun, your life, your CCW permit. Make your own decision.
He's full of it, ignore him. He sounds like the type who should not have a gun
But make that decision honestly.
Most of the excuses I see for not carrying with a round in the chamber indicate a greater fear of ones own firearm than of a violent assailant.
If that's how somebody feels, they should be honest about it.
Truth be told, if I was in such terror of my own defensive tool, I wouldn't carry it.
I think maybe you take it a bit too far. Then again maybe we just disagree. Most of the reasons I see for C3 is to add a layer of safety beyond C1 and to me, that's being as honest as you can be.
I agree with most of the C1 side when I say that I don't see the need for that layer of safety but I don't think they are more afraid of their weapon either just because they want another layer of safety.
Keeping one in the pipe without a manual safety engaged or extensive firearms training is akin to building a home on a shoddy foundation.