Kanew, people who post the signs you talk about don't want people who think like you on their property.
Why would you insist on going somewhere you are obviously not welcome?
I'm having a real hard time understanding why people think that property rights are more sacred than the right to defend yourself.
Kanewpadle said:I'm ENforcing my right to protect myself anywhere anytime within the law.
Kanewpadle said:And your right, freedom only works if EVERYONE respects everyone's rights. But because someone hung a "No Guns" sign on the door, THEY forced their beliefs on ME.
Kanewpadle said:Private property or public property, freedom and the rights of all should be observed and respected by all, all the time.
Your rights do not trump the other person's rights on their property. Would you like someone telling you that you could not carry a gun on your property? It's a two way street.
The law doesn't give you that right...there are exceptions to the laws in most if not all states which preclude legal carry, such as schools and government offices. In addition, if you carry a gun inside a premise that has posted the 30.06 sign, you are not within the law (in Texas.)
You have every right not to shop at or patronize that business. You do not have the right to enforce your beliefs on someone else.
What you are really saying is that the rights of all should be observed and respected as long as you agree with them. Your statements have indicated that you have no respect for, and no intent to observe, another person's legal right not to allow firearms on his own property. You want your rights, but you don't want to allow another person to have his rights, if they do not agree with your beliefs. You want to force someone to adopt your beliefs, and are not willing to allow them the same freedom that you have.
No disrespect buddy, but I can't explain it any better than that. If we disagree, so be it.But I think we're done here.
...
I obey the law. ...
Absolutely not. If it's not on my person it's locked in the safe. Leaving a firearm unattended, even in a locked vehicle, is negliegent in my opinion.
I am not a negligent person when I leave my gun in my car anymore than I am negligent when a piece of trash breaks in my house and steals something. It is not my fault that there are pieces of trash that want to steal and prey on the public and blame other people for their sorry ways. I would be negligent to leave a loaded gun on a playground but my gun in my car is my business and if someone bothers either one they are a piece of trash that is violating the law. I AM NOT NEGLIGENT! LarryAbsolutely not. If it's not on my person it's locked in the safe. Leaving a firearm unattended, even in a locked vehicle, is negliegent in my opinion.
When I go into a place I can't carry in. Ex. Hospitals. I leave my firearm unloaded in the glove box and take the ammo with me.
Don't need to walk up on someone who broke into my truck and get shot with my own firearm.
What - It ain't cheatin' unless you get caught?"
Your fallacy is in saying that you only break the law if you get caught breaking the law. Kind of like saying your wife is having an affair only if you actually see her in bed with another man...
And you're having way too much fun pulling our collective leg.
Good Day.
I have a metal lock box with a cable that attaches to the seat frame.
I attach mine to my Rottweiler's collar wrapped in a juicy steak.