Finally said the hell with it, on the BG2.0...

Pretty much every UTV, 4 wheeler etc I've ever seen has a 25 hour break in period for the engine, listed in the manual. Most of these cost more than what I spend on my cars, and certainly more than most people spend on a gun.
Easing into the first 25 hours is one thing. No need to do 100 on the way home from the dealership, but if your wipers didn’t work, or the car would occasionally stall, you’d bring back a new car. And cars are significantly more intricate than a gun.

A cleaned and oiled gun should work. Period. Yeah, some ammo might be the issue, but factory quality ammo if any brand should work reliably.
 
As I contemplate this thread, it is interesting to me that anyone is worried about a tactical reload with a .380. Why not carry a more reliable and powerful caliber in the same size handgun not known to have issues - 9mm or better? If a reload is even considered a potential necessity then a .380 should never be on a carry list. A reload is required if your shots with the first mag are misses or not incapacitating. A story that I will make short reminds me of a partner that went to the local drug store about 9 am to pick up a Rx before coming to work. We were plain clothes working evening vice. Upon entering, he quickly realized he had just walked into a robbery in progress. The bad guy pointed a handgun (make and caliber not recalled) at him and started screaming as he was now a 3rd “hostage” with two other customers. My partner had a Walther PPK/S in an ankle holster. He told me later that he never felt more under gunned and the Walther on the ankle felt a mile away… This was the real deal for sure. A silent alarm had been tripped and when the bad guy fled, my partner then drew his Walther and followed him outside of the store. As they rounded the corner of the building there was a marked LEO car facing the back of the store waiting for a back up unit. Lots of screaming commenced by the uniform officer and my partner in plain clothes wanted the uniform guy to recognize him and then the bad guy started shooting at both of them. The Walther was fired several times as the bad guy was getting into his car with no body hits but the uniform officer stopped the fight with several rounds from his 357 as his backup arrived and exited with his Remington 870 but did not fire. My partner stayed busy the rest of the day giving statements and such but the following day, traded the Walther for a Colt LW Commander in 45 ACP.
What I read there was that your buddy was a lousy shot with a .380 PPK. I suspect most people are. Those small, blowback 380s are nasty things to handle. The big advantage of the BG 2.0 and several other recent 380 offerings is that they used locked breech operation.

Regarding a tactical reload in a civilian self-defense event in any caliber, I'm still waiting for evidence that it has ever happened.
 
Using a fully loaded, 10 round magazine for a spare, with the BG2.0.
It's not a problem, charging the pistol, with an open slide and a 10 round magazine.
A reload, against a closed slide, is another matter. Realize that the magazines can be really slammed in there. But, in case of an unexpected visit to the two way range, I'm doubtful of a successful tactical reload.
I've downloaded the spare mag by one.

Have been experimenting with one spring and follower. Clipping a coil just made the follower motion feel lazy. Taking a millimeter off the bottom of the follower does seem to help, and I may experiment further with that.
In the mean time, 9 it is, in the spare mag.
Moon
Halfmoonclip, this is not specifically for you but.....I must be very fortunate. I own more firearms "than Carter has pills" and I have only had one (1) that needed tweaking (and it turned out to be ammo specific). My firearms span from 1872 to present. My perspective (having professional carried for three decades, and performed maintenance on thousands of fighting firearms as an armorer) must be different. I load mags to capacity, shoot the "snot" out of most of them, carry some for personal defense, shoot others for fun and train law enforcement with others, as well. I shoot factory and reloaded ammo, new and old mags, obsolete and modern calibers, etc. Does an occasional problem occur...yes, but its usually my fault or something easily corrected. I was as aggravated as some, I would consider a new hobby. And as far as new cars are concerned, they should work as manufactured but put Kool-Aid in the tank instead of proper gasoline and see the result. And "break-in" periods are required for some firearm-types, even if we don't like it. (and "break-in" may be for the owner...familiarization, ammo selection, purpose of purchase, etc) Many gun owners know very little about maintenance or performance, so it becomes easy to complain about the manufacturer. Any mechanical object, be it a car, firearm, coffee maker or fork, will not long perform if used outside of its designed, engineered, or manufactured operational window. Clipping off spring coils, shaving followers, rubbing gravy on the finish or repeating incantations rarely "solve" operational problems. Best of luck and I hope you're able to enjoy the tools of your hobby (or profession).
 
What I read there was that your buddy was a lousy shot with a .380 PPK. I suspect most people are. Those small, blowback 380s are nasty things to handle. The big advantage of the BG 2.0 and several other recent 380 offerings is that they used locked breech operation.

Regarding a tactical reload in a civilian self-defense event in any caliber, I'm still waiting for evidence that it has ever happened.
Good thought about the civilian defense action/tactical reload. Most folks don't know what a tactical load is. As a police officer of 3-decades and a deadly force instructor, I can only recall a rare instance of a non-professional "topping off" after a defense event. Most people move to a safe area, call 911 and wait for help. A "tactical reload" is mostly unnecessary. As I teach nationally, I have found several police departments that have quit teaching the "tactical reload" and opted for a simple full-mag change, dropping the partially used mag instead of retaining it. Considering the template of self-defense evenrs, this option is not without merit.
 
Good thought about the civilian defense action/tactical reload. Most folks don't know what a tactical load is. As a police officer of 3-decades and a deadly force instructor, I can only recall a rare instance of a non-professional "topping off" after a defense event. Most people move to a safe area, call 911 and wait for help. A "tactical reload" is mostly unnecessary. As I teach nationally, I have found several police departments that have quit teaching the "tactical reload" and opted for a simple full-mag change, dropping the partially used mag instead of retaining it. Considering the template of self-defense evenrs, this option is not without merit.
Why discard a magazine with live ammo? I get dropping the mag in the unlikely event of reloading at all, but why drop a magazine with live ammo? Retaining it takes almost no effort.

But as for civilians doing tactical reloads, it’s mall ninja nonsense.
 
KBM..it looks like you have law enforcement experience, as I do, but you may have been deprived of street-level gunfight training at your agency, as many agencies are. The only effort you need is to finish the deadly, close quarters fight NOW, not hold onto equipment that you MAY need later. I have taught mag retention for decades but I fully understand why an agency would teach otherwise. Retaining a partially loaded mag, or any gear, and attempting to stow it on your person while someone is trying to murder you at typical gunfight distances is not a fight-winning skill. Magazine retention is being reconsidered around the nation by professional deadly force trainers, as are silly competition actions like front-sight focus, trigger reset, pressing to the wall then confirming sight picture immediately before completing the press to sear release, and many others. In the late 1980's when I became an instructor, I taught what the instructors before me taught, and I later learned how wrong I was. They taught officers to shoot, and I migrated into teaching officers to fight. Separate worlds and difficult for some to mentally cross. But once you do, things become much easier, fluid and clearer. Here's a great book that re-aligned much of my thinking, as did the course, "Beyond the Muzzle: The Firearms Instructor & Shooter Development Guide" (retired police instructor wrote it). A Google search should find it at the publisher (Snub Noir I think). It's an eye-opening read for those who teach or are interested in personal defensive use of a firearm. Stay safe, my friend.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top