Glock 17 DETHRONES M&P9 edc gun!

Univibe

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2018
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
2,157
Location
TX
I've had a month's vacation from smith-wessonforum.

Things have happened.

I always didn't like Glocks. About 15 years ago, I tried the G23 .40 and the G19 9mm. Hated the boxy grip, the finger grooves. Just didn't like it. Picked up and handles G26 a couple of times. Dreadful.

About 3 years ago, I ditched the compact 1911 for EDC and got M&P9 full size. No complaints, M&P's a good gun.

I recently shot a G17 gen 5. Gone are those problems. Finger grooves gone, stippling is right, grip shape is improved and fits my XL hand.

So I bought one. Did a shoot-out, Smith vs. Glock. I shot the Glock better right out of the box than I did the Smith with which I'm familiar.


BOTTOM LINE: Glock is the new EDC for the mean streets of the big city; M&P is for sale.


Call me traitor.
 
Register to hide this ad
Univibe... traitor...:D (You have asked for this)...

But seriously, like Eric300 posted, use what works best for you.
I've tried few Glocks and none of them shot even close to my M&P9, sometimes I think my M&P22 shoots better than Glocks...:p
But this is only personal preference...
 
56356982.jpg
 
Glock gives financial incentives to billions of law enforcement agencies to trade in other brands and switch to Glock.

As to shooting a Glock better than a (fill in the name of the chosen competitor here), it all depends upon the shooter. Some love the feel of the Glock, some cannot conform and assimilate into the Glock.
 
Billions of law enforcement and military personnel carry Glocks for a reason. They just flat out work as shooting irons. (Even though they are made of plastic.) Glock: Perfection. Truth in advertising.

Because the bureaucrats decided it was the best gun for their folks based on pricing, politics, etc. Doesn't mean it is best.:D
 
I own 2 Glocks, well, technically 3 but one is a cut away model. The best thing I can say for them is they work, but then so does every other pistol I own or I wouldn't own it (again, not counting the cut away model). What Glock lacks though is soul. Glocks are like a cheap wrench. It works, but it's no Snap-On.
 
Over a yr ago , when I got my Texas permit I witnessed the guy next to me during the shooting exercise using a glock . It became a " jam-0-matic " before the range session was over . Maybe it was his ammo , I don't know but it sure wasn't pretty watching him struggling in those timed sessions . Regards Paul
 
Carry and shoot what fits you and your needs the best. I still love revolvers and carry one sometimes. Switched to a 1911 of some sort for years. Several years ago I tried a Glock 19 and hated the blocky grip. Later carried and shot a Gen-4 19 that I customized for some time. I sold it as well as a CZ P10-C and purchased a Gen 5 Glock 45 and an M&P 2.0 Compact. I like the no finger grooves and the fact that being a lefty, they both have slide stop/slide lock on both sides. I have also gotten used to the grip angle on the Glock and they just work. Nothing wrong with any of the quality striker fired stuff that is out there. I recommend several quality brands to my students.
 
I had a similar realization about 8 years ago, but it was the Gen 4 Glock 19. Shot it better than my M&P first time out after quite a bit of time with my M&P with an Apex DKAEK trigger. Also happened to fit my hand better. Though recently I made the switch to the Sig P365XL for EDC.
 
I'm not going to take sides or bash on any brand. All my handguns are 95% S&W, 4% Ruger and 1% Glock. Only Glock I own is a 17 because I wanted to see for myself what it was, or wasn't. I also had a 22/40 cal, also no issues with that either; sold it to someone who wanted it more than me.

I don't keep anything that I can't carry with complete confidence, revolver or semi-auto. I shoot them all well and they are all accurate (for me/my use). Just my opinion :-)
 
Looks we have started "Glock Talk" :D
I'm staying with M&P :)

GLOCK + 99% AFTERMARKET PARTS = PERFECTION.... never out of the box.
Sorry, but Glock's logo is little exaggerated...;)
 
I don't know if I would EDC a Glock, but I do know that my opinion of them has changed. My first exposure to a Glock was in the late 1980s/early 1990s, and it was a "crew served" 9mm (probably some variant of the Model 17. Needless to say, I didn't like the feel.

Fast forward to about 2016. My club conducted an NRA range safety officer training, and I got trained. A year or two later, my club needed safety officers for a GSSF event, and I stepped forward. In that year, and the year that followed, I was lent a Glock so I could fire the match. I was appreciative, but I needed my own in order to learn it's quirks, that is when I was introduced to the Gen 5. Last spring I picked up my own Blue Label G17.5 and started looking for a GSSF match to participate in, despite COVID. I added miles to my truck heading from home to Virginia, Alabama, and Georgia, where I managed to win high challenged at each location.

For matches, I seem to be shooting the Glock acceptably, but I don't believe it could find a way into my carry routine. Currently, for when I can carry, it will be either a 1911 Commander or Sig P365 MS (when a semi-automatic would be more appropriate), or my 686+ 3" when a revolver would fit the bill. The G17.5 is a nice pistol, but I'm not ready to bank my life on it.
 
Back
Top