Have you seen one nicer???

Joined
Feb 19, 2025
Messages
124
Reaction score
376
Location
Kansas City, MO
I picked up this marlin model 80 .22 off gunbroker for cheap. I had low expectations, beings as these are basically hardware store guns from the 50s. It looked nice in the photos, but they weren't great pictures. I honestly couldn't tell if it was walnut or a piece of hardwood that happened to get some figure and translucence in it. They made both through the years. It showed up today and WOW. I aint saying I havent seen better walnut, I certainly have. I can say I ain't seen wood like this on one of these! Must have been the lucky walnut 2x4 at the marlin factory that week.

1000007443.webp1000007444.webp
 
Register to hide this ad
I still have my cheaper Glenfield model 25 (made my Marlin) which is basically the same exact rifle. Of course your Marlin has a more beautiful Walnut stock whereas my Glenfield has a fairly plain Beechwood stock. My Marlin - Glenfield shoots like an expensive rifle and also has a surprisingly excellent, smooth and light trigger which is amazing for a $35 rifle of the early - mid 1960's. This is my very first real firearm - got it as a gift from my Dad on my 11th Birthday.

The model you have should be highly accurate and have a descent trigger far beyond some of the more expensive models sold today. That rifle sort of deserves a half way descent scope and then you will have yourself a tack driver! Enjoy!
 
It must have taken some time to set up the photo backdrop. Had to get Beau in the photo. Sprinkle some cotton and a cloth around. And get some of the better weeds in the photo. 😅
The dogs are a regular part of the photo backdrop for guns without any special effort. They like to hang out in the basement with me while I work on them & always follow me out when I take outdoor photos.

1000006788.webp
1000007319.webp
1000006779.webp
1000006862.webp

1000007433.webp
 
Question for any of you.......
many years ago I read in a gun rag of the time that those black stripes on walnut stocks are made at the factories, using a torch. Anyone else ever heard that?
Definitely NOT running down your gun, I love, and have, a number of old .22's like it, and looking for more when I can.
Bob
 
Certainly not the case on this one. Just figured wood.

There is a DIY fad of using an acetelyne torch to darken wood similar to staining it. I have never heard of that being used in the gun industry.
1000007462.webp
 
A Marlin 80-DL was the first gun that was MINE - got it for Christmas when I was 11 and still have it, 70 years later. My father worked at a company that had metal working and finishing equipment, and at one point had a machinist give the barrel a finishing pass in a lathe, then we polished the barrel and receiver and reblued them. They're still a glossy bright blue. The wood is perfectly ordinary, though, nothing like like the OP's gawjus example.

Mine has the micro-groove rifling, and over the years I've tried different ammo. (I've been a target shooter all my life, so small groups out of a gun are a thing for me.) Mine can shoot VERY tiny groups with some ammo - including Eley Tenex, which I tried just to say I'd done it. Biggest challenge to top accuracy is the primitive trigger, which I have polished with Flitz on a Qtip but have not tried anything more aggressive.
 
Just the natural grain in the wood showing itself off.
Even the standard walnut used in the Field grade guns at the factorys would produce some very nice high grade looking blanks once in a while.
Quite often blanks with some figure on one side of the butt or just a little on both sides appeared.

In the Wood Room as they were often refered to at the factorys, the guys handling the blanks that were being profile/inletted cut would set aside any really spectacular looking stock that came off of the profiler.

The management would often let it be known that they wanted it so. Those special stocks being then used on guns made up for presentations, factory gifts to writers, company executives and the like.

They also got stuffed 'under the bench' so to speak for a favor from other employees looking for such a stock for their own rifle or shotgun.
Lots of that went on inside.

I never saw any use of figure/grain enhancement used in the factorys.
Common wood staining was about it to disguise some sap wood at times or just plainly to make lesser species like beech look more like Walnut. But then the entire stock was dipped or sprayed with the stuff. Usually a solvent based stain because of the hardwood like Beech or Sycamore being used that don't respond much at all to oil base stains..

Flame streaking is used or has been used by some 'smiths to enhance or add the look of wood grain.
Swabbing linseed oil into the wood first and then using a torch very carefully over the wood was a somewhat popular finish in the 60 and 70's.
Stockmaker Hal Hartley kind of resurrected the finishing style back then, He made most all of his stocks in Maple

The oil boiled and colored the wood in those areas a brown color of different shades.
If you got it too hot it quickly charred it though.
I think they used to call it Sungi Wood finishing
A blowtorch works better than a pencil point propane torch tip.
The technique works & looks better on Maple, Apple, etc than Walnut.
 
Beautiful! I have an early 60s Marlin .22 Magnum deluxe that has some really nice wood on it, and little white diamond inlay at the wrist, and decent checkering. As others have stated, run of the mill guns back then were sometimes more nicely finished than anything commonly seen today. Bad thing on my Marlin is it has a terrible trigger, and the trigger assembly is riveted together in such a way that you can't easily take it apart to address the poor trigger issue. 🤨
 
Nice looking rifle. Stock is almost certainly Birch with some factory enhancements to give it the appearance of figured Walnut.


Birch was used on the Glenfield and Box Store editions of the Marlin 80 & 81.
Could be a figured piece of stock wood taken from a Glenfield. In that case it could be Birch.

The giveaway would be the lack of the Marlin 'Bullseye' black&white dot in the toe-line of the butt.
Marlin didn't put those plastic inserts into any of the stocks except the AmWalnut wood stocks meant to go on the Marlin marked guns.
Another would be the butt plate. The Marlin marked gun (like the 81 would have a 'Marlin' logo butt plate. The others like a Glenfield or other storebrands would have their own marked plate. A few just a plain grooved plate.

Marlin never 'enhanced' the wood that I know of during production. Too much time involved .
There was a spray coating of stain on some. The finish itself sometimes contained a color 'toner' to do just that to the wood if it was too light in color for specs.
The latter was mostly on the Glenfield and Box Store guns that were given stocks made of Beech, Birch and sometimes Sycamore..
Light colored woods , much cheaper to buy than AmWal but more than strong enough for the jobs. Plus sometimes they too could have some nice figure especially the Birch.
I don't recall them ever using Maple, but if they did there would be some really spectacular figured stocks around.

The only 'heat' used that I saw used in the wood room was that in an induction set up to burn in the final fit of the Lever Action frames to their butt stocks. Made for a perfect fit.
Very fast , only a few seconds to do each, and efficient. It left no hint of the operation on the outside stock surfaces that the owner sees. Just a slight darkened and glossy hard wood surface to the inletted surfaces inside where wood to metal fit was affected.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top