The power lever of the 44 mag ....IS...still impressive today.
If they remade "Dirty Harry"
- Thread starter Univibe
- Start date
The power lever of the 44 mag ....IS...still impressive today.
Chino74
Member
Dolf Lungren would make a great older Dirty Harry IMO. I would go see that.
3rdgeargrndrr
Member
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2014
- Messages
- 1,162
- Reaction score
- 1,193
For the life of me cannot remember the title of a movie I couldnt beleive was made recently about a rogue cop that had a revolver that was magazine fed. Horrible movie
They would definitely rush out to buy one. Being useful has nothing to do with it. How many people that ran out and bought a Model 29 when the first movie came out do you think actually had any use for it?
I have owned a 500 S&W for a few years. I have shot a few thousand rounds through it. I still have not come up with anything useful to do with it! But that is not the point anyway.
Green Frog
Member
Then there is Sam Elliott, who played Selleck's older, tougher brother in several movies. I'd still be proud to grow up to be him! There are still some men in Hollywood, but the scripts being written don't give them the proper showcase for their manliness (or even true heroism.
)Froggie
500SNW
Member
I sold mine and have never looked back. Cartoonishly large and impractically heavy for a HANDgun ...I quickly learned that it couldn't do for me, anything that my .45-70 Guide Gun couldn't do better. I lump the X-Frames into the same category as Desert Eagles...IMHO they are novelty guns for fun at the range and also useful as "movie guns." For practicality and power-to-weight ratio...the original Magnum lineup of .357, .41 and .44 are IMO still the best and hard for any newcomers to beat.
Last edited:
Well, let's not forget that when Harry lost his 29 off the pier in _Sudden Impact_, he went back to his old 44 Automag! So the question of "What after the 29?" is already answered. 
But then, if you consider Gran Torino as Harry in retirement, he's gone 1911. Take that, Glock!
miker
But then, if you consider Gran Torino as Harry in retirement, he's gone 1911. Take that, Glock!
miker
Then there is Sam Elliott, who played Selleck's older, tougher brother in several movies. I'd still be proud to grow up to be him! There are still some men in Hollywood, but the scripts being written don't give them the proper showcase for their manliness (or even true heroism.
Froggie
Terrel Sacket in the "Sacket Movies" based on books by Louis La Mour.
500SNW
Member
Sam Elliott, Tom Selleck etc? I don't need to point out the obvious, but many of the names people are bringing up are guys of advanced age. Sam Elliott and Tom Selleck are 74 and 73 years old, respectively. Wouldn't a remake be done with someone younger? Clint was 40 years old when filming began on the first film in the Dirty Harry series. I could see someone like Josh Brolin or Jeremy Renner doing the role as their age bracket would be a bit more convincing.
Last edited:
elm_creek_smith
US Veteran
A late former friend (He stopped being a friend before he stopped being.) carried a 4 inch S&W Model 629 on a duty belt as a member of the Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lake Division. His rationale was that since there was no way to secure a shotgun to their fiberglass boats he wasn't going to be outgunned. It worked for him but didn't stop him from becoming an a**hole overblown with his own importance.
Sent from my XT1710-02 using Tapatalk
"Dirty Harriet" would be played by Alec Baldwin in drag driving a yellow Prius and carrying several less than lethal weapons, smoking a vape pipe.
LOL!!!! And likely true.
I think if there was a re-make of Dirty Harry, he'd still carry the .44 Magnum Model 29. All the other cops would be sprayin' and prayin' with the 9mm. Cool, calm and collected, Harry would be getting bad guys left and right. And with all the new different people out there too offend, I think his short, well thought of insults would be hilarious.
I think a shoulder holster would be worse than a belt holster. Just my opinion. For me it would be.
It has been my experience that heavy handguns are best worn on a heavy duty leather belt. Lightweight and small/thin handguns do ok in shoulder holsters. That has been my experience.
As for movies and tv, the actors do not shoot every scene wearing the handgun. It is my understanding that holsters and firearms are used only when the scene calls for their use.
Last edited:
daglockman
Member
The 500 Magnum can be downloaded with 500 Smith and Wesson, just like Harry did with his .44 Mag. feeding it .44 Special ammo. That is, if you can find any 500 S&W. I have some and it is great to shoot, especially introducing someone to the 500, but it is getting harder to find.
That being said, it would be ridiculous to carry a X frame 500 around on duty, unless your last name is Tackleberry.
I would also consider it sacrilege to even attempt to remake Dirty Harry.
That being said, it would be ridiculous to carry a X frame 500 around on duty, unless your last name is Tackleberry.
I would also consider it sacrilege to even attempt to remake Dirty Harry.
