Is the 9mm really that poor?

I really like my .45's, but when I carry a 9mm, I most definitely do NOT feel "under-gunned".

And I have yet to see anyone who trashes the 9 as a less than manly round, offer to take two in the chest to prove the point.
 
Bill Jordan autorgraphed my personal copy of "No Second Place Winner" with a nice personal note at Shrevport, LA. in June of 1977.

As to your other statement about no one still carrying the 9mm try the NYPD, LAPD, LASD, or the US Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard to name a few.

Is it the best tool for the job; probably not, but it's been getting it done round the world since about 1905.

Not sure about your statement since I have a cousin with LAPD and they have been using the .40 for a while. Also, if you will search some public records, you will find the military is phasing out the 9mm and as such, is currently using both until the phase out is completed.

Yes, the 9mm has been around a long time but then so has the buggy whip. Times change. Technology changes. Better ideas come and go once an even better idea arrives.

There will always be people that want the 9mm and that is fine if they are comfortable with it. I still often carry a S&W .357 with six rounds and do not feel undergunned. I also stated I am not a fan of Glock but I carry the Glock 22 during my daily work. All I am saying is the studies show the 9mm to be an inferior projectile to the .40 and most depts have gone to the .40 while other depts allow carry of several approved calibers, one of which is the 9mm.
 
Not sure about your statement since I have a cousin with LAPD and they have been using the .40 for a while. Also, if you will search some public records, you will find the military is phasing out the 9mm and as such, is currently using both until the phase out is completed.

The military recently ordered a ton of new Beretta M9's. Sure the USCG and some individual units are using .40's, but in general it's still the M9 and will be for the forseeable future.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, it ought to be mentioned that the military uses the 9mm NATO. It's a different cartridge because it runs at higher pressure than even commercial +P+ 9mm offerings IIRC. I doubt that the U.S. would ditch the NATO cartridge without the other member nations agreeing to do so. Also, military ammo is FMJ, so those of us not restricted to the use of such ammo ought to look at the performance of the best JHPs, not the battlefield performance of nonexpanding bullets.
 
Al Gore invented the internet for two purposes:
Ultra fast immediate access to porn
Making 9mm shooters feel that their carry gun is inadequate

I don't need the porn, and I believe no matter what caliber, center mass hits count
 
Al Gore invented the internet for two purposes:
Ultra fast immediate access to porn
Making 9mm shooters feel that their carry gun is inadequate

I don't need the porn, and I believe no matter what caliber, center mass hits count

I think it all comes down to that Sheriff. Good hits. And just as important, keep getting good hit's until the subject is out of the fight.

I carry all three calibers and don't feel bad about either. I am confident in my ability to defend myself effectively with either one.

We can argue/discuss caliber choice all we want. And some people do. We all know that caliber selection is only part of the self defense package as well as gun selection, training, practice, and mindset. One without the rest is dangerous to yourself and those around you.
 
What kanewpadle said is true. Bullet placement is the key with any type of ammo. Normaly,I aim for the eyes with my 9mm Glocks and my revolvers in .357/.38 ammo. So you can take it for what it is worth but,also the shot placement is key to putting bg down and to make sure the bg dont get back up. rz625-8
 
zactly, and this is where ALL these debates end up, with the ultimate truth...it ain't the arrow, it is the indian shooting it

My favorite quote on the subject: "sure it matters who's got the biggest stick, but it matters alot more who's swinging it."
 
What? A caliber war on an internet forum?

If it IS a war, then I will be bringing my .45acp as the 9mm is clearly inferior firepower when it comes to internet based warfare. (Of course that's not true in real life.)
 
well i have a few comments, if you are looking between the 9mm and the .40 my winchester PDX1 JHP will expand to over .60 and fly at over 1000 fps, and second there was a saying that was pretty darn true, a .45 will make a substantial wound a 9mm will make a substantial number of wounds, both do the job go with what works for you
 
I have a 10mm. I use it every time I bleed the brakes on a Corolla:D
 
"I have a 10mm. I use it every time I bleed the brakes on a Corolla"

Strato, you have a Toyota with working brakes? You better check that thing for recalls, LOL!!
 
"I have a 10mm. I use it every time I bleed the brakes on a Corolla"

Strato, you have a Toyota with working brakes? You better check that thing for recalls, LOL!!

Actually my ex has the Toyota and she became my ex because she recently got pregnant from another man.:(

I think the brakes work:confused:
 
Back
Top