It appears that there's a problem with the 15/22!

Status
Not open for further replies.
No it wouldn't be common sense it would be a Felony. You're talking about two very different things here.

Explain why that would be a felony. How is that different from a teacher confiscating a cell phone when a student uses it during class? Schools have written rules regarding cell phones... Appleseed could have similar rules regarding guns determined to be unsafe.

Its not like these guns are class III weapons. Now that would be a felony to take possession of such a device.
 
So let me get this correct, you are more worried about S&W than you are about safety? Hmmm.

I would hope this not adversely effect Smith and Wesson, as Appleseed is just trying to make them aware of a potential safety issue. They are not trying to hurt S&W in any way, but to ensure the safety of the shooters on their lines.

Appleseed is not trying to ruin anyone's business. Their goal is to let folks know the rifle is temporarily disallowed at Appleseed Events due to a potential safety issue until Smith & Wesson formally investigates the problem and issues an official corrective action if necessary.

There is a potential safety issue here reported by multiple persons in multiple states. Until the S&W investigates and adjudicates the issue, let's all be aware of it and be careful. Simple. What are there, a bunch of Smith and Wesson stock holders on the forum? Or is it just a confederacy of dunces?

And you appeared to join to defend Appleseed.

Why should we be buying into your opinion?
 
Last edited:
Explain why that would be a felony. How is that different from a teacher confiscating a cell phone when a student uses it during class? Schools have written rules regarding cell phones... Appleseed could have similar rules regarding guns determined to be unsafe.

Its not like these guns are class III weapons. Now that would be a felony to take possession of such a device.


Theft of a firearm is a felony in every State. You can't just take someone's firearm away from them. In some States that would be an unlawful transfer as well. Not to mention possession of a firearm that is not registered to you is a crime in some States. Then there's the liability problem involved in tinkering with someone else's firearm especially by someone other than a licensed gunsmith. Cell phones and firearms? You can't see the difference?
 
I for one join the others who are calling for some restraint. Keep it professional gentlemen. What you post here will forever be searchable on Google and summarily attached to S&W's name and reputation.

I'm amazed at all the personal attacks in this thread. Why are so many folks taking this issue so personally?

Appleseed decided that, for the safety of their range officers and patrons that they were suspending the use of the 15-22 at their events after several documented cases of similar malfunctions - until such a time as it can be determined safe to continue to do so. Sounds reasonable to me. I would think ANY range officer of any level that didn't do that very thing would and should be chastised for gross incompetence and negligence and removed from the position; possibly worse.

Appleseed has taken the best action they can as they see fit. And let's be clear guys n gals, THEY run their ranges and events; they make the rules that govern the events they hold. They have to shoulder the responsibility for them. Last I knew rules ought to mean something, even if you or I don't like them.

Don't like Appleseed's response to a documented issue? Fine, don't go to an Appleseed event. Don't get angry and fly off the handle as if they have insulted S&W as a company, or the folks that would dare own one personally. Don't sit at the bravest of places -the keyboard- and insult the professionalism of Appleseed staff. How rude.

If common sense serves me well, which it always has, then rest assured S&W and Appleseed are more than likely working on a solution to the issues that address most (if not all) of the concerns laid out by the rather colorful posts herein.
 
Don't like Appleseed's response to a documented issue?

I for one join the others who are calling for some restraint. Keep it professional gentlemen. What you post here will forever be searchable on Google and summarily attached to S&W's name and reputation.
There's a good example of "Appleseed's response to a documented issue" in their decree to their instructors.

The "run-away" incident per Project Appleseeds decree to its' "instructors":

A Project Appleseed "instructor" worked on a 15-22 with an extractor problem (not uncommon in 22LR semi-autos) and AFTER HE WORKED ON IT it went full auto. So, the rifle was sent back to S&W, repaired (I assume free of charge under warranty) and returned. In spite of the fact that "The rifle performed well the after that" (grammar Appleseeds') "It now sits in the vault as an expensive club.”

This raises a simple question: What will make Project Appleseed happy? S&W professionally responding to a problem and rectifying it clearly didn't satisfy Project Appleseed.

Project Appleseed seems to not be using restraint, common sense, good judgment or acting professionally.

When this is over my 15-22s (that have been shot in competition without issue for 3+ yrs now plus practice) that Project Appleseed has deemed "un-safe" will be no different than they were. I guess at some point they will magically become "safe" because of a Project Appleseed decree?

As has been mentioned, there has to be more to this we haven't heard.

I'm wondering what the rest of the story is.
 
Last edited:
We have a visitor range at my local range which operates similar to that line. .22s dont throw hot brass very far nor is it very hot. QUOTE]

Please tell that to my right arm. I shoot my 15-22 left handed (very left eye dominate) and I have numerous scars on my right arm from 3rd degree burn where the brass has landed on my arms. I have to wear either long sleeve shirts when shooting it or wear a poker type sleeve (basically a fabric tube that has elastic at both ends to hold it up) on my right arm to protect it. My poker sleeve is made out of cotton. So I can feel the heat of the brass on my arm when one lands there, but since cotton is a natural fiber, the heat from the brass does not melt through the fabric.

If the guy next to you is standing what, 3" from your ejection port then yeah I guess. I take photos of shoots quite often requiring me to stand in the path of ejected brass and never been injured by a .22 case which has travelled more than 2 feet.

Tomcatt51, that hadn't occured to me. Good point.
 
If the guy next to you is standing what, 3" from your ejection port then yeah I guess. I take photos of shoots quite often requiring me to stand in the path of ejected brass and never been injured by a .22 case which has travelled more than 2 feet.

It is not the brass that is the only concern, rifle parts can fly also, have seen an extractor fly over 30' from the rifle. Parts to not often fly, but it can and does happen.
 
If the guy next to you is standing what, 3" from your ejection port then yeah I guess. I take photos of shoots quite often requiring me to stand in the path of ejected brass and never been injured by a .22 case which has travelled more than 2 feet.

It is not the brass that is the only concern, rifle parts can fly also, have seen an extractor fly over 30' from the rifle. Parts to not often fly, but it can and does happen.

My 15-22 throws brass a good 8 feet ; but it's not gonna hurt anyone.
 
My 15-22 throws brass a good 8 feet ; but it's not gonna hurt anyone.

A few months back, a father in Sarasota killed his son when he reacted to hot brass hitting him. IMO, any brass potentially striking a shooter with their finger on the trigger ain't a good thing... especially when training novice shooters. I guess we can debate if 15-22 brass is hot. Mine gets plenty hot.
 
I didn't realize Appleseed was obligated to do anything they don't want to. Are they a private entity? They deemed it unsafe at this time. If it's my place and I deem it unsafe ya better not bring it over


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Amid all of the seriousness of this thread I do find some humor. I laughed at the suggestion that Appleseed should confiscate misfiring guns to protect the chain of evidence for S&W. Really???

The only thing I can see that would have made this tread truly hostile and blow up like an OBD is if the report would have said "Appleseed RO confiscates unsafe S&W 15-22". This thing would have gone nuts. They are Range Officers gentlemen, not Police Officers. If a RO "confiscated" a personally owned firearm the whole firearms community would be screaming about it.

I do not care where I am legally shooting. I am leaving with the firearms I came with. If there is going to be a confiscation of my firearms it will need to be done by a true law enforcement official. And I hope to hell that never happens because I am a good guy and a responsible shooter. The only way it could happen is if there was a serious accident.

Lets be real here and leave things like confiscations and chains of evidence up to the professionals who have that kind of authority.

PHXSHOOTER
 
I may be incorrect but i do not think that what was meant by 'confiscation of the gun', was to be taken literally. It was to highlight the seemingly 'knee jerk reaction' to a "Blessedly unserious injury" sustained by a shooter at a particular event. To which the event holders in question decided that all the other rifles that resemble it are deemed unsafe and will not be allowed to participate, until...and this is where is gets weird...until S&W deem the rifle safe.

Surely S&W are going to stand by the popular selling rifle and without any evidence of aftermarket tampering or even a gun to inspect, then what on earth can they do? except point to the numerous other rifles that are in the happy hands of satisfied owners.
This type of action certainly deflects from the seemingly lax safety practices, which were highlighted by the recent injury sustained...as the saying goes 'Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye'

The way i see it from this thread and PM's i received from a RO at Project Appleseed, they are taking no portion of blame for this event in regards their safety aspects and procedures, citing cost and troublesome nature of providing effective safety measures. Simply on the premise that this has never happened before.

IF the individual rifle in question did not OOB and the shooter was not injured, we would NOT be having this discussion. The 15-22 would still be allowed. The rifle did malfunction, but the shooter was injured because of inadequate safety measures. THAT is the be all and end all of the argument.

To put it another way....a 68 Dodge charger race car runs off a track at high speed plows through a crowd of people because no safety barriers were erected and such an instance has never happened before and the event organisers blame the 68 Dodge charger and ban it from their races in future until Dodge investigate. However the car was allowed to be driven away and no one made a note of whether the car was running nitro or anything else about it. So Dodge have nothing to investigate....then some guy goes on Dodges forum and says that all 68 Dodge chargers are unsafe and banned from future events.
Leaving 68 Dodge charger owners, scratching their heads.
 
A few months back, a father in Sarasota killed his son when he reacted to hot brass hitting him. IMO, any brass potentially striking a shooter with their finger on the trigger ain't a good thing... especially when training novice shooters. I guess we can debate if 15-22 brass is hot. Mine gets plenty hot.

How in the world did that happen? Was he shooting in a bay that the brass bounced off of? Or on a line with too many shooters in close proximity?
No debate on the brass - it is definitely hot, at least when it leaves the chamber. How long it stays hot enough to cause a reaction could be another matter entirely, but I don't have any data on that.
 
I am not part of the Appleseed “management,” but I am a Shoot Boss for Appleseed. Shoot Bosses are the people who run the events, who are ultimately responsible for everything that happens at an event. I’d like to address some points from one particular post.

Have any other rifles been "temporarily banned" ever?

The only other rifles ever banned were all semiauto 17 HMRs. And that ban was permanent, in part due to an industry-wide recall on them.

So, in all of the Appleseed events to date, there has never been another reported case or cases of firearms malfunctioning? Not even anecdotally? There have never been any cases of squib loads or ammo issues?

There have been plenty of malfunctions on our lines. Every possible malfunction you can imagine – FTE, FTF, double feeds, duds, etc. Typical round counts at our events are 400-500 rounds in a weekend. We also shoot rain or shine, so the rifles see rain, mud, dirt and dust. This increases the likelihood of malfunctions.

I’ve even had a squib on my line that the shooter didn’t catch. She cleared the malfunction (as a squib usually causes a short stroke), chambered another round, and pulled the trigger. Fortunately, she wasn’t injured, but it scared the heck out of her. It bulged the barrel and receiver, and blew out the mag. It was a Ruger 10/22, she sent it back to Ruger (at their request) and they replaced her rifle at no charge.

But again, in all of these instances, no one was injured.

People are allowed to bring, in some cases, highly modified (perhaps not by a qualified gunsmith) firearms without any kind of review by a qualified person and that's OK? And none of those have ever caused an issue?

Yes, people are allowed to bring any rifles they want, as long as they’re below 8mm caliber. We can’t police every rifle for non-stock parts. Are you aware of any other shooting program that does? Does Mas Ayoob bounce your pistol out of a MAG40 class because it has an aftermarket trigger?

Have modified rifles caused issues? Yes, but not injuries. Personally, on several occasions, I’ve asked a shooter to remove their rifle due to repeated malfunctions/concerns. But I’ve never confiscated them. ;-)

I'll bet that if all issues were accurately reported there have been many, many more issues with some of the rifles that are more popular than the 15-22.

Possibly. But the difference in this situation is that a shooter was injured. Seeing the common thread here? We’ve had tens of thousands of shooters come through our events. We’re proud of our safety record. Safety is absolutely paramount at Appleseed, and in an abundance of caution, the temporary ban was put in place.

If we had another shooter injured by a 15-22, how would that play out regarding lawyers and liability? As I tell my kids, this isn’t the way we’d like the world to be, it’s the way the world is. Every shooter, even observers, has to sign a liability waiver before they can participate. That’s just the way it is with insurance companies and lawyers.


I tend to believe this is a anti black rifle issue.

This is simply preposterous. Appleseed was created under the philosophy of teaching Americans how to shoot milsurp rifles out to 500 yards. We LOVE centerfire rifles on our lines. Heck, at my last event I was excited because over half the rifles on my line were ARs. And we had one shooter using his Garand! But we also realistically acknowledge that centerfire rifles are expensive, and so is the ammo. Using a 22 gets one through the weekend much more economically. Plus, there aren’t a lot of ranges where one can shoot that far, so if we wanted to continue to grow, we had to scale our program down to fit more ranges with shorter distances. And that scaling down made 22 rifles practical substitutes.

There seems to be a misconception that Appleseed is a youth program, or only for new shooters. Are we family-friendly? Yes. Are we a youth program? No. We're an "everybody" program. We teach foundational marksmanship skills, very similar to what is taught by the US Marine Corps. Field-expedient rifle shooting, using nothing but your rifle and a sling. Regardless of skill level, Appleseed will make you a better shooter. I’ve had active-duty Marines attend an event and tell me on Sunday afternoon that they learned more in a weekend with us than they did at Parris Island. Kids especially benefit because they’ll learn good habits that will last them a lifetime. But mom and dad, and even grandma and grandpa will learn something, too.

The organization needs to come up with a reporting and formal process to ensure that all participants, manufacturers, etc. are treated fairly and safely.

We have hundreds of events every year all over the country, and thousands of shooters in attendance. It's not possible to report/track every malfunction. But again, to re-iterate, major safety issues are reported – squibs, OOB, anything that has the potential to cause injury. I believe Appleseed is acting fairly in this instance. S&W was contacted BEFORE the temporary ban was announced. And the AOC is continuing to work with S&W to reach a solution.

I have steered people to check out Appleseed events in the past. Until I hear that this is resolved and changes are made to ensure that all manufacturers are treated fairly, I will no longer do so.

I will also work to insist my local club range do a "temporary ban" on Appleseed events until they have their policies and procedures revised to ensure the safety of all.

Thank you for promoting Appleseed. I'm sorry that you believe we're treating S&W unfairly. But I believe I’ve adequately addressed your concerns. Please feel free to contact me via email if you have any further concerns.

I can be reached via email at M I at appleseedinfo.org (the abbreiviation for Michigan).
 
Last edited:
I’ve even had a squib on my line that the shooter didn’t catch. She cleared the malfunction (as a squib usually causes a short stroke), chambered another round, and pulled the trigger. Fortunately, she wasn’t injured, but it scared the heck out of her. It bulged the barrel and receiver, and blew out the mag. It was a Ruger 10/22, she sent it back to Ruger (at their request) and they replaced her rifle at no charge.

SO basically if she had have been injured then you would have temporarily banned ALL Ruger 10/22's? Did you issue any warnings about the danger of Ruger 10/22's.? Did you contact Ruger about how safe their rifles are? Did you go on Rugers forum and tell all about how unsafe their rifles are?

Probably not...so once again the issue comes down to the fact that someone was injured....nothing more. Not the rifles fault, a freak accident that can happen with any rifle as your statement pointed out.

Can i ask what it is exactly that Appleseed expect S&W to do regarding this incident? Also did you contact the ammo maker, regarding their contribution to this awful but not too serious injury? Also did you question any safety measures that your Project could have in place which would render any such incident less likely to involve the injury of a second or third party. Such as something as simple as dividers between shooters.
 
Interesting thread and certainly more balanced than the Appleseed press release. My searches led me here.

Having been to one of their weekend classes, there is a certain arrogance to the Appleseed "instructors". Perhaps it's the pseudo-history they teach. One thing they are not is trained gunsmiths.

Our 15/22s are not perfect, but they are reliable if we take care of them. This looks like purely an attention-getting effort at the expense of S&W. Their instructors are devoted to the Ruger 10-22 - so who knows what the motivations really are.

And this program is all about safety? Why did their senior instructor sell off a rifle he felt was unsafe? What a joke. Keep those guys away from me and my family!!!

-Tom
 
banner4.jpg


Are public ranges setup like that?

If that's how they're rolling that's no beuno, they need to correct that before some hot brass hits someone and causes bad things..... My 308 Garand chucks brass so hard it hit a divider then nailed my friend in the arm hard enough to draw blood. Without any screens or dividers brass out of the 308 Garand leaves with enough authority it often ends up in Arizona....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top