New to me 29-2 - How should I deal with wear?

AEM

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2008
Messages
46
Reaction score
43
I fell for a beautiful 4" Model 29-2 and bought it on sight. It is practically NIB. I am thrilled to get it but I am aware that it won't be as durable as later Model 29s that have the endurance upgrades. I remember these revolvers spitting lead and jacket fragments back in the 70s and saw the cylinder rotate backward on one gun. I plan to shoot mostly mid-range and below-maximum cast bullet loads in this revolver, so hopefully will never have to worry about significant wear, but I would appreciate advice on the following:

Should I be pro-active and have as many as possible of the endurance package features installed now, such as springs, bolt stop, etc.? I understand that it may not be feasible to retrofit some of the endurance upgrades such as lengthened cylinder stop & notches, bolt block, radiused studs and cylinder yoke mod with heat treatment.

If I should retrofit as many of the endurance features as possible, should I send it to the factory or to a gunsmith? Any recommendations for a good gunsmith for the older Smiths?

I plan on having the forcing cone opened to 11 degrees as well. Any thoughts about having it done by the factory vs. a gunsmith?

Thank you
 
Register to hide this ad
Using less than full power ammo for the majority of your shooting should be adequate for minimizing wear. I'd certainly shoot it before making any modifications to the forcing cone, it may shoot very accurately as-is.
 
Considering there ain't no picture, I say wear the hell out of it, who cares?
My newly acquired 27-2 is in 100% condition and un-fired so I only handle it.
IMG_2956.webp
 
Here are a couple of photos off the auction site. I fell hard for this one.
 

Attachments

  • -BEAUTIFUL-Smith-and-Wesson-Smith-and-Wesson-29-dash-2-with-4-barrel-and-factory-target-grips...webp
    -BEAUTIFUL-Smith-and-Wesson-Smith-and-Wesson-29-dash-2-with-4-barrel-and-factory-target-grips...webp
    327.9 KB · Views: 0
  • -BEAUTIFUL-Smith-and-Wesson-Smith-and-Wesson-29-dash-2-with-4-barrel-and-factory-target-grips...webp
    -BEAUTIFUL-Smith-and-Wesson-Smith-and-Wesson-29-dash-2-with-4-barrel-and-factory-target-grips...webp
    398.9 KB · Views: 0
Using less than full power ammo for the majority of your shooting should be adequate for minimizing wear. I'd certainly shoot it before making any modifications to the forcing cone, it may shoot very accurately as-is.
I am concerned about spitting lead and jacket material more than accuracy. But you are right- I will shoot it before making any mods.
 
I fell for a beautiful 4" Model 29-2 and bought it on sight. It is practically NIB. I am thrilled to get it but I am aware that it won't be as durable as later Model 29s that have the endurance upgrades. I remember these revolvers spitting lead and jacket fragments back in the 70s and saw the cylinder rotate backward on one gun. I plan to shoot mostly mid-range and below-maximum cast bullet loads in this revolver, so hopefully will never have to worry about significant wear, but I would appreciate advice on the following:

Should I be pro-active and have as many as possible of the endurance package features installed now, such as springs, bolt stop, etc.? I understand that it may not be feasible to retrofit some of the endurance upgrades such as lengthened cylinder stop & notches, bolt block, radiused studs and cylinder yoke mod with heat treatment.

If I should retrofit as many of the endurance features as possible, should I send it to the factory or to a gunsmith? Any recommendations for a good gunsmith for the older Smiths?

I plan on having the forcing cone opened to 11 degrees as well. Any thoughts about having it done by the factory vs. a gunsmith?

Thank you
Shoot specials.
 
Shoot specials.
Thanks, but I have .44 Specials. As I mentioned, I bought this one to shoot .44 Magnum loads, albeit not a lot of heavy loads. Wear in these guns is enough of a problem that S&W spent years on efforts to make them more durable. I am trying to decide whether to make some of those mods and, if so, now or wait until endshake becomes excessive, the cylinder starts rotating backward onto an empty chamber, shrapnel starts flying out of the barrel-cylinder gap, etc.?
 
I think that you're falling for some "fake news" about S&W .44 Magnums and Model 29s. Although there may be some truth to the fact that the occasional .44 Magnum revolver displayed the issues that you're concerned about, those were probably loaded with extremely powerful rounds and had hundreds or thousands of rounds shot through them. I have a few S&W .44 Magnums and Model 29s and have never had an issue with any of them (except for a loose front sight on a 4" version which was easily fixed). If you plan to shoot a bunch of .44 Magnum, perhaps you would be more comfortable with a newer Model 629 or similar. It would be a shame to completely rework your vintage and valuable Model 29-2, but it is your revolver and of course you can do with it what you wish. Good luck!
 
I think that you're falling for some "fake news" about S&W .44 Magnums and Model 29s. Although there may be some truth to the fact that the occasional .44 Magnum revolver displayed the issues that you're concerned about, those were probably loaded with extremely powerful rounds and had hundreds or thousands of rounds shot through them. I have a few S&W .44 Magnums and Model 29s and have never had an issue with any of them (except for a loose front sight on a 4" version which was easily fixed). If you plan to shoot a bunch of .44 Magnum, perhaps you would be more comfortable with a newer Model 629 or similar. It would be a shame to completely rework your vintage and valuable Model 29-2, but it is your revolver and of course you can do with it what you wish. Good luck!
I agree. If you hunt with a .44 mag use magnum loads. If you shoot at paper or steel targets use loaded down magnum cases or .44 spec. The idea of shooting 100s or 1000s of magnum loads through a handgun at least for me is not what I would call fun. I've been a reloader since the 70s. The last time I saw factory .44 mag cartridges for sale I believe they were a little over a buck a round.
 
Those stocks you have are as nice as I've seen. Metal and bluing looks terrific in those pics.
You have a classic collectors item.
For me, that would be an occasional outing with it but I wouldn't shoot it a lot.
Did it come with papers and presentation case?
They don't make them like that anymore.
From what I have seen and understand as a relative newbie, they make them stronger, and cheaper today but not as cool or pretty.
The old ones were handmade works of art by craftsmen.
Today's classic models are still great guns but like high quality prints of the original paintings.
 
Don't fix anything that is not a problem. Shoot it and enjoy it.
Like others have said, you will soon limit the number of heavy loads that you put thru it.
 
Back
Top