NY Found A away Around the SC Carry Decision

Here is a latest (interpretation??) of the need or not to attend the 16+2 hrs of class and range time course for NYS P/Permit applicants.

According to this local news story (WHEC-10/Rochester)
The language in the latest information handed down from DCJS (NYS Dept of Criminal Justice Services) makes differences betw :
NYS P/P Recertification and NYS P/P Renewal.

The language shows up in an explanation of what the 16hr class room and 2hr Range time cousre will cover. As well as who will be able to teach it (certification).

In the document :

".....Licensing officers are responsible for ensuring that concealed carry firearm
license applicants have received the required training from a Duly Authorized Instructor
prior to license issuance or renewal...."

The key wording is 'prior to license issuance or renewal'.
License of course being the NYS P/Permit.

'Issuance' is that of a a brand new P/Permit to a person who had not had a P/P before the new law goes into effect (9-1-22)

'Renewal' is the process whereby some jusristictions within NYS require their P/Permit holders to re-apply every 3 yrs for their NYS P/P
It means a complete from scratch application with picture(s), fingerprints, character references, a background check usually done by the County S/O or the Metro PD of the area. These licensing juristictions generally require a Handgun Safety Course as well.

These 'RENEWAL' juristictions are where the 16+2hrs NYS Safety course will be required now for existing NYS P/P holders.
They are generally downstate,,NYC, Nassau, Suffolk countys..

Upstate,,the majority of P/P holders have had to 'Re-Certify' their NYS P/Permits in the last few years.
Permits are issued with no expiration date.

The re-certification was to verify the info on the permit.
Not only the personal info of the permit holder, but also the individual gun info (registration info) of the guns on the permit.

Re-certification has been done 'on-line' or by mail.

No new P/P application, no new picture, no new prints, no character references, etc.
Just the verification of the P/P info.

According to this article and the DCJS says it agrees with it in a Fed Ct hearing, the difference in the two is the difference in having to take that course ,,and not having to take it.

...Any NEW P/P applicants, no matter where they may reside in the state applying after 9-1-22 will have to take and pass the course as part of the P/P application process.

That's how I read it now.
Of course things change over nite. So we will see.

Link to the article. It was also a news story on the local station.

NYS issues Minimum Standards for Firearm Safety Training - WHEC.com



There is so much more in this new law like the storage requirements & the Point of Contact being changed to the NYSP on Dealer Sales.
The latter isn't any different from what some other states do.
The phone # will be (eventually) the same # the dealer will call to do an Ammunition Background Check when that ever comes to be. As that 'check' will be done by the NYSP.
The little hidden gem in all of it is the 'fee'.
When an FFL/or Licensed 'Seller of Ammo' calles that new number for a background check, a $15 'fee' is charged to the dealers phone for the call.
Doesn't matter if the call is to check the backgrd for a $1000 firearms sale or a box of .22's for an ammo sale.
(No word on when the Ammo Sales background check system will be up and running.
The exact same system called for in the 2014 SAFE Act never came to be. So we can only hope they are doubly successful.
 
It is every three years

If you read S51001, renewals are now every three years, with 4 character references, and in-person interviews. The full text of the bill is telling of the contempt some have for the 2A.
 
So some counties recertify, and some renew. 3 years ago, can anybody have ever dreamed 95% of the state would be off limits to lawful gun carriers? At any rate, I wouldn't be shocked if the recertification becomes a renewal soon enough. All it takes is for one lawful carrier to get a DWI or get caught in a "sensitive area". The first guy at a political rally with an AR. The first traffic dispute that somebody displays a weapon. The first workplace complaint. The news will say he recertified his permit by mail and no check was done of his character. I mean, if the intention of the social media check is to look for red flags like white supremacy attitudes (and although I find those beliefs to be reprehensible, aren’t they covered by the 1st Amendment? If we’re going to ignore the 2nd, why not the 1st? They’re talking about safe storage checks so they’re already going to ignore the 4th). You can be a long time gun owner who makes those objectionable posts long after acquiring the permit. There were retired cops and pistol permit holders at the Capitol On January 6. People do change. Certainly criteria changes. What is ok 5 years ago is now not. In 2016 a MAGA hat was no big deal. Now you’re a white supremacist if you wear one. Or at least you are if the civil servant doing the background check THINKS you are. Of course, there’s been no clear definition of what social media activity would disqualify you.
A stroke of her pen, the governor will change that, too.

Regardless, this is the worst thing to happen to gun carriers. Other anti-gun states will soon follow. Connecticut, California, Illinois, New Jersey, you're next. If NY can get away with it, the precedent has been set. This is a blatant work-around the SC decision, and the response has been lackluster at best.
 
Last edited:
After 66 years in NYS looking like it’s time to get out of Dodge. Tax and take away your rights. Excelsior!
 
People who have lawfully carried for decades will be barred from doing so in virtually every public place, other than gun ranges and woods. I fail to see how that is not a total disaster.

And I don't know what document you are referring to since you didnt post it.

Your assessment of the document that is the subject of this thread differs from mine. You said you wouldn't bother to read it. I merely posted the section of the new NY law so you didn't have to waste time reading the whole thing.

And yes, no kidding, it is worse than a total disaster.

Alo please see post #61 - think that summarizes it well.
 
Last edited:
Your assessment of the document that is the subject of this thread differs from mine. You said you wouldn't bother to read it. I merely posted the section of the new NY law so you didn't have to waste time reading the whole thing.

And yes, no kidding, it is worse than a total disaster.

Alo please see post #61 - think that summarizes it well.


I don't care about the recertification vs. renew part. First of all, it will only be a matter of time before that is changed. If the point of social media inspection is to make sure people who have made certain statements are denied a permit, it makes absolutely no sense for that not to extend to recertification. A guy with a permit for the last ten years can post some **** online, too. And the first time that happens, the governor will change that little tidbit in the law.

And I didn't read the document you refer to because you didn't post it. If you had I would have read it. If I missed it, my apologies.

Here is the list of "sensitive locations". COvers pretty much every public area. If you live in a rural part of the country with no schools, movie theaters, restaurants that serve alcohol, train stations, or hospitals, congratulations, carry away. Most people don't.

"schools, universities, government buildings, places where people have gathered for public protests, health care facilities, places of worship, libraries, public playgrounds and parks, day care centers, summer camps, addiction and mental health centers, shelters, public transit, bars, theaters, stadiums, museums, polling places and casinos."

As now the presumption of whether private businesses can allow guns is that they don't, so if your local supermarket wants to allow you to carry your weapon, they need a sign indicating that. A sign that will surely draw the attention of anti-gunners and impact their business. Something I am sure the governor knew before that was added to the bill. I work in Orange County, NY, a pretty gun friendly county. I’m not betting on seeing a whole lot of those “Guns Welcome” signs in the businesses I frequent when I am there. The CVS, the gas station, the pizza and Chinese place, the fast food restaurants. I’d bet that 95% or more won’t have those signs.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top