cmort666
Member
This didn't start happening until the publicity machine could plaster their names and faces within hours. In the 19th century, if somebody in Maine shot twenty people, somebody in Nebraska might not hear about it for months, if EVER.Here's another thought, you want to stop this ****?
Stop making these *** heroes. Stop posting their pictures, their names or anything about them or the event. These sickos think their actions will gain them fame, immortality and a place in history.....so far they are right. Stop it, instead pass a law and make it well known on the news that anyone who does this has any record of their existence stripped from public records/acknowledgement and their dead bodies will be fed to pigs.
I'll bet this **** drops 90% of the way off.
Now, somebody in Florida can kill a bunch of people and a like minded degenerate in Alaska can watch the carnage LIVE.
There's a difference between technological capability and actual implementation. Commercial media parade these subhumans on the public stage like rock stars for two reasons:
- Money - "If it bleeds, it leads." They don't care whether they're encouraging others to emulate these beasts. They care about ratings. Don't believe the LIES about the "public interest". The COMMERCIAL media will wade up to their necks in the blood of toddlers for an extra ratings point.
- Ideology - They're anti-gun and anti-self-defense. They're FAR more sympathetic to somebody who shoots twenty children than they would EVER be to somebody who shot that murderer with a privately owned firearm. They couldn't care less whether they encourage more shootings, if they think it'll lead to more repressive gun controls.