Since the last election piqued my interest in self defense, I have been to this site daily and I never fail to learn something. This is a great site and I appreciate the civil tone of the conversations. I used to peruse the Colt forum also but it doesn't have nearly the participation that this one does.
A few days ago there was a thread where someone stated that stainless steel is just as vulnerable to rust as as a blued finish. I can't find the thread and I don't think that was the general topic, but as I recall no one challenged or commented on that statement. I have been going over that in my mind and I just had to bring it back up for discussion.
This is my personal experience: I bought a slightly used 66-1 2.5" back around 1980 for $150.00 with box and holster. I never had any use for the holster as I did not have a permit until 2009. Numbers on the frame are E3, 790xx. It was a LEO trade-in that I bought from a friend who briefly owned a sporting goods store. For almost thirty years this gun has been under the seats of various cars, carried in various tool boxes and handled quite a bit but I never got around to shooting it until this year. Since I never shot it and I always considered it to be impervious to rust, it has never seen a drop of oil (until now). It has been frequently handled with bare hands and not wiped down. I think that will cause rust on a blued gun as fast as anything. I'm sure it has been exposed to plenty of condensation due to extreme temperature changes in high humidity (17 years in Mississippi and 5 in Louisiana). I usually keep it in a Crown Royal bag and that is its only protection. The gun still looks perfect with not a hint or a trace of rust anywhere.
As I said, that statement drew no comments in spite of the amount of exposure it got here. I am very interested to hear some other opinions about this.
A few days ago there was a thread where someone stated that stainless steel is just as vulnerable to rust as as a blued finish. I can't find the thread and I don't think that was the general topic, but as I recall no one challenged or commented on that statement. I have been going over that in my mind and I just had to bring it back up for discussion.
This is my personal experience: I bought a slightly used 66-1 2.5" back around 1980 for $150.00 with box and holster. I never had any use for the holster as I did not have a permit until 2009. Numbers on the frame are E3, 790xx. It was a LEO trade-in that I bought from a friend who briefly owned a sporting goods store. For almost thirty years this gun has been under the seats of various cars, carried in various tool boxes and handled quite a bit but I never got around to shooting it until this year. Since I never shot it and I always considered it to be impervious to rust, it has never seen a drop of oil (until now). It has been frequently handled with bare hands and not wiped down. I think that will cause rust on a blued gun as fast as anything. I'm sure it has been exposed to plenty of condensation due to extreme temperature changes in high humidity (17 years in Mississippi and 5 in Louisiana). I usually keep it in a Crown Royal bag and that is its only protection. The gun still looks perfect with not a hint or a trace of rust anywhere.
As I said, that statement drew no comments in spite of the amount of exposure it got here. I am very interested to hear some other opinions about this.