The media is spreading fear

Technically correct, but misleading, imo.

....From a hypothetical local news.......

After 2 months we finally had a death on Monday.

Tuesday, 3 people died.

OMG the world is about to end, the death rate just went up by THREE HUNDRED PERCENT.

See I could be a journalist too. Its my 1st amendment rite.

(rite was sarcasm)
 
....From a hypothetical local news.......

After 2 months we finally had a death on Monday.

Tuesday, 3 people died.

OMG the world is about to end, the death rate just went up by THREE HUNDRED PERCENT.

See I could be a journalist too. Its my 1st amendment rite.

(rite was sarcasm)
No. The headline should scream

"DEATH TOLL QUADRUPLES IN JUST ONE DAY!"

Obviously you wouldn't make it as a professional journalist. Clearly you're just an amateur. :rolleyes:
 
When the media shows the daily death count "statistics" for COVID-19, I think it would be awesome if they would add a column for those who have recovered. You know, the 98% they don't seem to want to talk much about.

93257837_2902462099819874_8080980215804723200_n.jpg

I don't get it - you can't just subtract the number of deaths from the number of confirmed cases and get the answer yourself? Of course the news doesn't report that particular fact - because it's not news. When they talk about the number of fatalities from auto accidents or the number of people who died from a heart attack where is the outrage that they didn't also mention the number of people who lived through an accident or survived their heart attack? Or should I say "faux outrage"?
 
The best path for the media, print and
electronic, is to not question nor analyze
anything the federal administration says
each day.

The media should print and air only the
exact words of the federal administration
and stop seeking non-administration
points of view.

This should be the journalistic policies even
beyond the current main issue of Covid 19.

I sincerely hope that you meant this as a joke - because that is what it is. The 1st Amendment grants freedom of the press, and "not questioning the government" is the very antithesis of a free press and abhorrent to the US Constitution. This country was founded on the concept of questioning authority and I'm quite certain it's not about to stop now. Nor should it.
 
Nope.

Given it is absolutely certain far more folks have had (or do have) Covid-19 than those who are 'confirmed,' simple subtraction gives a false number...one far less than the actual number of survivors. (Note: This was addressed earlier in this thread.)

Be safe.

I don't get it - you can't just subtract the number of deaths from the number of confirmed cases and get the answer yourself? Of course the news doesn't report that particular fact - because it's not news. When they talk about the number of fatalities from auto accidents or the number of people who died from a heart attack where is the outrage that they didn't also mention the number of people who lived through an accident or survived their heart attack? Or should I say "faux outrage"?
 
I don't get it - you can't just subtract the number of deaths from the number of confirmed cases and get the answer yourself? Of course the news doesn't report that particular fact - because it's not news. When they talk about the number of fatalities from auto accidents or the number of people who died from a heart attack where is the outrage that they didn't also mention the number of people who lived through an accident or survived their heart attack? Or should I say "faux outrage"?

As reported by the evil media today, it is being found that
those who survived the virus, be it a mild case or severe,
that some continue to test positive. It is not known if that
means they can transmit the virus while being immune
themselves. It also does not mean that they could not
have a recurring attack because the medical people just
don't have enough data yet.

It ain't just in the numbers. It's the fact that the
medical community and scientists really do not have
a firm hand on this virus yet as to how to counteract
it.

So don't be a smarty pants. :D
 
Last edited:
Given it is absolutely certain far more folks have had (or do have) Covid-19 than those who are 'confirmed,' simple subtraction gives a false number...one far less than the actual number of survivors. (Note: This was addressed earlier in this thread.)

Be safe.

...which is EXACTLY why the press doesn't report that number. And that is the point I was commenting on.
 
I sincerely hope that you meant this as a joke - because that is what it is. The 1st Amendment grants freedom of the press, and "not questioning the government" is the very antithesis of a free press and abhorrent to the US Constitution. This country was founded on the concept of questioning authority and I'm quite certain it's not about to stop now. Nor should it.

If the sarcasm there wasn't obvious, I take pity.
 
...which is EXACTLY why the press doesn't report that number. And that is the point I was commenting on.
Precisely. Can't talk about the reality of the number who don't die. Increasing the denominator in the equation might make the numbers less terrifying and the story less sensational. Can't have that - it might hurt ratings. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Precisely. Can't talk about the reality of the number who don't die. Increasing the denominator in the equation might make the numbers less terrifying and the story less sensational. Can't have that - it might hurt ratings. :rolleyes:

Ok, let's back up a step because someone here needs to do a few deep knee bends...

My point has been that you can do the math yourself - but you know that the numbers are not accurate. Which coincidentally is the reason why the press isn't reporting it. Therefore it is nothing more than "faux outrage" to complain that the number isn't being reported!

As I said, they don't report the number of people who survive a heart attack or who don't die in an auto accident - because we know that the numbers won't be accurate or even mean anything. And today, COVID-19 is exactly the same where the "survivor" numbers are just as inaccurate and just as meaningless - and coincidentally also not worth reporting.

When someone here comes out and says "but they aren't reporting the numbers of survivors" and I point out that that number is meaningless and therefore not news, please don't make my point for me then blame/shame me for agreeing with you.
 
If the sarcasm there wasn't obvious, I take pity.

I hate to rain on your parade but NO the sarcasm (if it was sarcasm) wasn't obvious. The post was presented in a direct, serious manner without anything to indicate otherwise.

I should know - I speak fluent sarcasm. All four dialects.
 
Ok, let's back up a step because someone here needs to do a few deep knee bends...

My point has been that you can do the math yourself - but you know that the numbers are not accurate. Which coincidentally is the reason why the press isn't reporting it. Therefore it is nothing more than "faux outrage" to complain that the number isn't being reported!

As I said, they don't report the number of people who survive a heart attack or who don't die in an auto accident - because we know that the numbers won't be accurate or even mean anything. And today, COVID-19 is exactly the same where the "survivor" numbers are just as inaccurate and just as meaningless - and coincidentally also not worth reporting.

When someone here comes out and says "but they aren't reporting the numbers of survivors" and I point out that that number is meaningless and therefore not news, please don't make my point for me then blame/shame me for agreeing with you.
Ahh, but there is a big difference you seem to be overlooking.
They don't crash our economy, trash our rights, and put 20 million people out of work when there's a spike in heart attack deaths. Or flu deaths. Or auto fatalities - or deaths of any other kind. Those things and the stats about them also aren't covered as the ONLY news story for weeks on end either.

If they are going to present the information over and over 24/7 for weeks on end, then at least we are entitled to a complete and balanced presentation of ALL of the available info. Not just a one-sided slant on everything that paints the worst, scariest, possible picture they can possibly conjure up. The negative numbers they are reporting aren't accurate either. They are inflated, just by the nature of what is being reported as a "COVID-19" death. We know for a fact that over 98% of people who are confirmed infected survive. But they put ZERO emphasis on that. They just keep on screaming about the NUMBER of dead.

But even in times of worldwide crisis they can't seem to be fair, balanced, or honest about presenting the info. They have to KEEP sensationalizing and jockeying for maximum ratings, no matter how much damage it does. This is the type of situation where we all need to rally together, but they keep working at dividing us.

Just watch one of the President's daily coronavirus briefings to see what I'm talking about. Pick up any newspaper or watch any broadcast or log onto any major media website and try to find the "other side" of the story. You can't. In times like these you SHOULD BE ABLE TO. But the positive spin is nowhere to be found. Ever.

What you call "faux outrage" is actually genuine disgust.
 
Last edited:
No. The headline should scream

"DEATH TOLL QUADRUPLES IN JUST ONE DAY!"

Obviously you wouldn't make it as a professional journalist. Clearly you're just an amateur. :rolleyes:

There is an old story I read about in a book by navy admiral Daniel Gallery. He told the story of a newspaper that reported on a patient who escaped from a mental institution and raped a woman.

The headline read (drumroll, please...): "Nut bolts and screws"
 
Our country is has about 360 million people and is reporting about 26,000 deaths or about 72.2 per million.

Lets another take a look at some area without our media or our government involvement.

Sweden, Norway and Finland all of which have government medical care, well educated populaces, good standards of living, sanitation and the same basic life styles. All right next to each other with the same weather climate and basic economies.

Sweden placed no restrictions on its populace and let life go on as usual.
It has a current death toll of 11,927 for its 10 million or about 1,193 per million Swedes.

Now Norway right beside it has 5 million people went under restrictions. Its current death toll is 139 per 5 million or just 27.8 per million Norwegians.

The Fins have 5 million people and a current death toll of 72. Thats 14.4 per million.

Please explain to me how shutting down the country is a mistake. How it isn't doing any good. How its all fear and hype.

Just why does Sweden who did nothing have a death rate over 16 times higher than ours? Why is it over 43 times one of its neighbors and about 83 times its other????

Because of the press?
Because they are somehow more vulnerable?

Couldn't possibly be because they didn't shut down businesses and practicing social distance. All thee "smart" guys know thats just a sham.

Waiting for a "Smart" guy to explain ity to me.

Please use small words so I can understand!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top