The Model 27 Three and one half inch BBL

I am "down" to two 3.5" M27-2s. Both are shooters with the blue (1967 Utah Highway Patrol marked) being my favorite. Great guns.
qYCScIW.jpg

Vzh9sek.jpg
 
Last edited:
Fat Tom- It's not ego if it's true...it's not bragging if you can do it.

Is "egotist" even a word?

Yes sir,it is. It is true however that many among the intelligentsia may prefer "egoist". I simply prefer the former. As far as you know,or rather in your "expert" opinion,is there an alternative for this one as well?



f.t.
 
I can't stand the service style under any circumstances. Looks or comfort they suck for me. GMAC- Do you know the rules of art? Or are you making it up as you go?
 
One man's arrogance is another man's confidence. You really seem to dislike me. Good thing I don't care.
 
I'll take it back...the service stocks look best on the fixed sight guns...the magnas definitely look better on target sighted guns.
 
With regard the 31/2 inch mod 27 I have 2 revolvers . One is NIB purchased when the bbl length was discontinued , the other was purchased as a used gun .
When I handle mine , I am mind full of G . Gordon Liddy . How ever you may remember him, in his auto biography he had an amusing story regarding mod 27 , 3 1/2 inch bbls . At the time Liddy was in the FBI , the gun was a gift from his wife.
The balance of the 3 1/2 inch is quite good and seems to point in a natural fashion.
The NIB gun was about $500.00 the used was about $ 359.00 purchased some time ago .other 27's came my way on other occasions ,mostly being in the right place at the right time , with a mind set to buy when the time comes.
Living in Canada the market is limited , where as citizens of the U.S. are free to find rarer models in any caliber
 
saxon pig- you never fail to get a laugh out of me. even on my worst feeling days.
 
Rick A-

Given the fact that I have degrees in art and in art history, and have studied design and composition, I would argue that my opinions on aesthetics are EXPERT opinions. I say that the target stocks on a 3.5" N frame are unbalanced, are too big for the rest of the gun, and that's my EXPERT opinion. Of course you or anyone else can offer your opinion in disagreement. But I will stand by my EXPERT opinion.

Nonetheless, an expert opinion is still an opinion. Aesthetics are totally subjective - everybody likes what they like regardless of what other more learned may think. However, I am kinda with you when it comes to target stocks - I don't find them aesthetically pleasing on any gun - to my eye they're one step above firewood.
 
To add...

If someone told me at the range (as someone always has to tell you something) that artistically speaking, my grips are wrong, they'd get a look something like this:
original.jpg
 
Wow........ at the risk of offending the "artsy" crowd....... I think the 31/2 inch 27 and the 3inch 19/66s share the same proportions of "barrel to butt".... a ratio that many/most find visually pleasing.

Every time I see a photo of a 3.5 inch 27; my heart flutters and I want one .... then I wonder why I didn't buy 2-3 in the 80s ........ I pick up one of my 3" 66-3/4s .....and remember "Oh that's right these fit my hand better!"


I guess it's too early for wine and cheese.............
 
Last edited:
While I find Magnas or Service grips slightly more aesthetically pleasing on the 3.5"ers my XL fingers demand targets or presentation grips on the range.




My fingers are stubs and the Magnas even suck for me. By forcing the lower 3 fingers so far back, it's harder to get my index finger to the trigger than with factory targets.
 
Back
Top