^^^sorry I blanked out there for a moment and lost track of time^^^ 

Maybe a flub; maybe what was meant but allowing 'plausible deniability.' Putin certainly heard it, poor lil dictator.
I would not bet the farm on that. Larry
I go with the "flub". I think you're giving the guy who said it way more credit than he deserves when you say he said it on purpose to get a particular response from Putin. I really don't think he's capable of that kind of international gamesmanship.
Easy to see that some here
believe Mr. Putin is the
sharpest knife in the world
gamesmanshp drawer.
He famously wears his heart on his sleeve, and having just spent time with Ukrainian refugees, was very moved by their plight...hence the outburst. (I'm neither endorsing nor criticizing what he said, just explaining my take on it.)
I'm going to stick with the "flub".
….. What he saw was a opportunity to take advantage of weakness in the resolve of the leadership here in the US to play to his political support. Just like when he walked into Crimea. I think we get in trouble when we try to compare his actions to some of the "cult of personality" leaders in small, relatively inconsequential, countries. Think N. Korea.
Great first-person account from Ukraine here, from The Atlantic...
What Foreign Fighters Are Seeing in Ukraine - The Atlantic
I would respectfully disagree and see it exactly the other way round. The Kims in Korea have always been superbly rational actors with laser focus on one goal: keep themselves in power by making it look too dangerous to anyone to try to remove them. And they've succeeded spectacularly; they've played with US presidents, and run circles around the Chinese, who theoretically are their "protectors".
In contrast, Putin really does seem to have added an irrational element, a sense of a historic mission, to the mix. I think it has more to do with the "greatness of Russia" than any wish to restore the USSR; Putin misses Russian power, not communism. A free and independent Ukraine, as the most important non-Russian former Soviet republic, was the biggest threat to that. And when it became clear that America's drift into isolation would not continue under this president, he decided he better act now. But obviously not fast enough.
The first rule of diplomacy is to never say what you're thinking. In this case, I'm glad he did. Other times, not so much.I go with the "flub". I think you're giving the guy who said it way more credit than he deserves when you say he said it on purpose to get a particular response from Putin. I really don't think he's capable of that kind of international gamesmanship.
By now, Putin has to wonder if his nuclear forces are as inept as his conventional sources.Which may be very little, here's a story, mostly about Russian gas exports having to be paid for in rubles, where the spokesman says Russian is not considering the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
Kremlin Warns No Rubles, No Gas, Says No Plans To Use Nuclear Weapons In Ukraine
Easy to see that some here
believe Mr. Putin is the
sharpest knife in the world
gamesmanshp drawer.
More armchair psychiatry from a person who has no training for it, I'll admit but it gives me hope that the world won't see the worst from him.
………
More armchair psychiatry from a person who has no training for it……….