What has happened to QC at Smith and Wesson?

jfeenin

Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2024
Messages
11
Reaction score
7
I know I may get some heat for this but WTH S&W??? Don't get me wrong I have always considered S&W some of the best guns in the "affordable by normal humans" price range. In fact in my household my wife and I have 8 handguns between us, 6 of them are S&W. However my experience with the brand in the past year has been frankly unsatisfactory. By that I mean out of 3 new S&W's acquired since last August 2 of them have literally had parts fall out/off on the first range trip. Seriously?

The first, a rather pricey model 60-15 Pro Series my wife bought last August had the pin holding in the locking bolt fall out in less than 2 boxes of ammo. Looking back at my pictures I took a pic of it after the first 15 or so rounds because, well it's a pretty gun and I wanted a wallpaper kind of pic of it. Regardless in that pic if I zoom in I can see the pin had already started walking out, I just didn't know it. 4 or 5 loadings later when I popped open the cylinder it felt funny and I felt something fall into my hand... It was the locking bolt. Very disappointing as I have 2 other J-frames currently and have owned others before and I have never seen this. Which is why I recommended my wife buy the SW over the Ruger in the first place.

So I called SW and they said they'd send me out two each of the pin and the spring because they are small parts and easily lost while re-assembling. OK fine. When will they be in? No idea, we're in the middle of moving and frankly it might be a bit. Not the answer I wanted to hear but everybody has a mess up once in a while. Weeks go by, no part. I call to follow up and they say yes they see the order was in but still can't see any estimated ship or even if it shipped. So eventually about a month later I get a little yellow envelope in the mail containing nothing but a tiny plastic bag with 2 pins in it. Yay, one part came in but what about the other and yes I scoured that bag for another tiny bag with the springs... notta. On the phone to S&W again, they still can't help and basically tell me I just have to wait. Personally if I was them I would have just sent 2 more springs just to be sure the customer got them. But no, they did not. It's nearly a year later and they still have not arrived. For an $800+ revolver this is completely unacceptable. After the last call though I had a gut feeling I wouldn't see them from Smith so I went on Brownell's and ordered them myself. I put them in (with a little tip I think I found here on this forum about peening the center of the pin) and several hundred rounds later she's still good. However having to wait months for parts to never show and then eventually buy my own parts to make a gun work that should have worked out of the box is not a pleasant experience. I've essentially given up on their support tbh. Waste of my time.

Still just the one bad one, crap happens right? Fast forward to a few months ago and I pick up a 9mm M&P 2.0 Metal. I was in Academy and I held it and I fell in love with it so it came home with me. That pistol has been nothing but flawless. A great big brother to my Shield I carry most (also flawless after thousands of round in the past several years). I cannot say enough good about my M&P Metal, I love that handgun. It may be my favorite handgun I have ever owned. So that's good at least. Also in theory I have a free green-dot sight coming in the mail from the rebate so bonus there.

So move on to this past week. I pick up an M&P 22 Compact. I took it to the range yesterday. First few shots were great. Std velocity CCI Clean Quiet and Remington Golden Bullets. Maybe 3 mags. Then I decided to try some CCI Stingers. As I am shooting I see the shot string is wandering to the side and I am thinking wow I must've had too much coffee or something but on the 6th shot suddenly the sight picture looked different all of a sudden. The rear sight blade had departed the gun. Last 4 shots from the mag went back in the box. Luckily I found the sight blade on the bench and the screw itself had not come all the way out. Another range trip wasted. I was able to re-assemble it later at home but the rear sight screw has literally no rotational tension. So it will just fall out again if I don't do something. Which from what I have read leaves me with two options... get the gun sighted in (and hope the screw hasn't turned on that last shot you tested that sighting with and superglue the screw since you cannot use thread locker in plastic, or two spend another $80 on aftermarket fixed sights from Dawson Precision. Oh I suppose I could go with option 3, send my gun back to Smith and be without it a month, or given my screw experience above never see it again, and have them superglue it where they think it should be.

So 2 out of three recent manufacture Smith and Wesson's fall apart on the first range trip. On the latter issue I find posts on this forum dating back years (now that I searched explicitly for that) where this has been a problem and it doesn't seem to have been adequately addressed. I have been trying to convince my wife to get herself a 380-EZ for a while now but exactly how am I supposed to recommend that now when the obvious retort is "Which parts are going to fall off that one when I need it the most?"
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
QC issues with S&W are nothing new. Before the internet there was little means of letting the world know of such problems...companies such as S&W simply repaired them under warranty and no one was the wiser.

The first S&W I ever purchased was in 1979...brand new Model 19-4. It was defective out of the box. It was repaired in due course under warranty...no more problem. The next S&W I had was a model 66...again defective right out of the box. Again it was fixed under warranty...no more problem. At the police agency I was an officer at we received a shipment of new Model 64 revolvers...upon testing one was found to have no rifling in the bore. It went back to S&W for a new barrel.

Defects are nothing new.
 
A few years ago I ordered a 627 Pro series from Buds. When I received it the cylinder would not rotate to lock when retarded with my finger. So I sent it back and they would not replace it. Their reply was that was as good as all of them. So I went To H&H and looked at two of them and they were the same. So I picked the best one. They were on sale so I got it for less. I then put a wider hand to make it right. The 625's that I bought back in the 90's all were timed right. If I buy another S&W I will all have my tools to measure it thoroughly. I have about 30 something older S&W but no more new one unless I know it is something I can fix myself.
 
The old "Lemon Policy" in manufacturing in the U.S.

This was especially true among U.S car makers.

It is this: As long as lemon production and complaints about them do not exceed satisfied customers, nothing to worry about.

Americans will stay with the brand and forgive the lemons.

S&W no different nowadays.

It's how finally foreign products gained the markets here.

Now some have succumbed to the "American way."
 
For perspective…Gotta add my experience with Colt.

In 1986 I bought a brand-new SAA in .44 spcl 7-1/2” bbl. I sent it back to Colt to be re-barreled to 5” and for a matching .44-40 cyl . Six months later…. Invoiced for $800, …I got it back with the work-order explaining it had been “rebarrelled, with matching .44-40 cylinder, Test-fired, targeted, and cleaned.”
In reality, it was filthy, the .44-40 cyl could not be installed at-all because the loading gate sprang forward and jammed when opened, and the original cylinder was stuck in the frame. On top of that, the front sight blade was “canted” to the left because the barrel was not seated properly in the frame.
My gunsmith sent it back.

A year later it came back, “Test fired, targeted, cleaned, etc” … and the front sight was Bent to the left in an apparent attempt to sight the gun… and the .44-40 cyl could be installed…but not loaded or rotated because …again…the loading gate would jam it.

My gunsmith was so frustrated he offered to buy the gun back and refund all my modifications-money…. but we made a “trade” for an entirely different pistol instead.
It’s the last time I’ll buy anything from Colt. (My WW2 era 1911 is the only Colt I now own. S&Ws and Rugers for Me ! )
 
✋🏻 Raise your hand if you refuse to believe “Smith & Wesson was always this bad, it’s just the new fangled internet only just now letting victims of lousy QC share stories.”

That’s BUNK.

S&W has never been worse at quality control. This is a new era and the darkest yet.
 
“For perspective” I got a “40th Anniversary” SIG 226 on Saturday. Took it to the range yesterday with 165 rds mixed ball/hp ammo from 5 manf. Flawless function/fit/finish. Yeah, no rail or optic cut but I don’t need either. Joe
 
✋🏻 Raise your hand if you refuse to believe “Smith & Wesson was always this bad, it’s just the new fangled internet only just now letting victims of lousy QC share stories.”

That’s BUNK.

S&W has never been worse at quality control. This is a new era and the darkest yet.
I just can’t hit the “like” button… but this is just too true and of others too!
 
Sorry for your grief! With they would go back to just Third Generations. Probably would cost over a grand but less complaints.
 
Not any attempt at politicizing or argumenting this topic, but S&W quality would improve if it unionized, because that would facilitate higher-wages, job security (and therefore employee-longevity), and benefits which would attract/keep better, more qualified workers, as evidenced and supported by events and experiences at Colt, Ruger/Marlin/Remington, Savage, and Browning.
The horrible experience about which I posted earlier was during the failed-contract talks at Colt with the UAW. “Replacement-workers” and supervisors were doing the sorry work described at that time. When a new UAW contract was agreed…the quality returned.
But it’s unlikely to happen in the current state of affairs, especially in TN which is another likely reason they moved.
 
Last edited:
When I have a few minutes to waste and need a good laugh, I'll look up some old threads and read all the comments that claimed abandoning their roots and craftsman employees for injection molding machines and cheap labor in Tennessee was the greatest thing since sliced bread.
 
I know I may get some heat for this but WTH S&W??? Don't get me wrong I have always considered S&W some of the best guns in the "affordable by normal humans" price range. In fact in my household my wife and I have 8 handguns between us, 6 of them are S&W. However my experience with the brand in the past year has been frankly unsatisfactory. By that I mean out of 3 new S&W's acquired since last August 2 of them have literally had parts fall out/off on the first range trip. Seriously?

The first, a rather pricey model 60-15 Pro Series my wife bought last August had the pin holding in the locking bolt fall out in less than 2 boxes of ammo. Looking back at my pictures I took a pic of it after the first 15 or so rounds because, well it's a pretty gun and I wanted a wallpaper kind of pic of it. Regardless in that pic if I zoom in I can see the pin had already started walking out, I just didn't know it. 4 or 5 loadings later when I popped open the cylinder it felt funny and I felt something fall into my hand... It was the locking bolt. Very disappointing as I have 2 other J-frames currently and have owned others before and I have never seen this. Which is why I recommended my wife buy the SW over the Ruger in the first place.

So I called SW and they said they'd send me out two each of the pin and the spring because they are small parts and easily lost while re-assembling. OK fine. When will they be in? No idea, we're in the middle of moving and frankly it might be a bit. Not the answer I wanted to hear but everybody has a mess up once in a while. Weeks go by, no part. I call to follow up and they say yes they see the order was in but still can't see any estimated ship or even if it shipped. So eventually about a month later I get a little yellow envelope in the mail containing nothing but a tiny plastic bag with 2 pins in it. Yay, one part came in but what about the other and yes I scoured that bag for another tiny bag with the springs... notta. On the phone to S&W again, they still can't help and basically tell me I just have to wait. Personally if I was them I would have just sent 2 more springs just to be sure the customer got them. But no, they did not. It's nearly a year later and they still have not arrived. For an $800+ revolver this is completely unacceptable. After the last call though I had a gut feeling I wouldn't see them from Smith so I went on Brownell's and ordered them myself. I put them in (with a little tip I think I found here on this forum about peening the center of the pin) and several hundred rounds later she's still good. However having to wait months for parts to never show and then eventually buy my own parts to make a gun work that should have worked out of the box is not a pleasant experience. I've essentially given up on their support tbh. Waste of my time.

Still just the one bad one, crap happens right? Fast forward to a few months ago and I pick up a 9mm M&P 2.0 Metal. I was in Academy and I held it and I fell in love with it so it came home with me. That pistol has been nothing but flawless. A great big brother to my Shield I carry most (also flawless after thousands of round in the past several years). I cannot say enough good about my M&P Metal, I love that handgun. It may be my favorite handgun I have ever owned. So that's good at least. Also in theory I have a free green-dot sight coming in the mail from the rebate so bonus there.

So move on to this past week. I pick up an M&P 22 Compact. I took it to the range yesterday. First few shots were great. Std velocity CCI Clean Quiet and Remington Golden Bullets. Maybe 3 mags. Then I decided to try some CCI Stingers. As I am shooting I see the shot string is wandering to the side and I am thinking wow I must've had too much coffee or something but on the 6th shot suddenly the sight picture looked different all of a sudden. The rear sight blade had departed the gun. Last 4 shots from the mag went back in the box. Luckily I found the sight blade on the bench and the screw itself had not come all the way out. Another range trip wasted. I was able to re-assemble it later at home but the rear sight screw has literally no rotational tension. So it will just fall out again if I don't do something. Which from what I have read leaves me with two options... get the gun sighted in (and hope the screw hasn't turned on that last shot you tested that sighting with and superglue the screw since you cannot use thread locker in plastic, or two spend another $80 on aftermarket fixed sights from Dawson Precision. Oh I suppose I could go with option 3, send my gun back to Smith and be without it a month, or given my screw experience above never see it again, and have them superglue it where they think it should be.

So 2 out of three recent manufacture Smith and Wesson's fall apart on the first range trip. On the latter issue I find posts on this forum dating back years (now that I searched explicitly for that) where this has been a problem and it doesn't seem to have been adequately addressed. I have been trying to convince my wife to get herself a 380-EZ for a while now but exactly how am I supposed to recommend that now when the obvious retort is "Which parts are going to fall off that one when I need it the most?"

Reply from Old_Patriot: I bought a Model 19-9 Classic about eight or ten months ago and I had issues during the second time at the range. After trying a few dozen .38 Specials on my first trip to the range I quickly saw that the gun preferred the full power magnum loads for accuracy. I don't shoot a lot of rounds because using factory full power .357 Mag rounds to shoot paper gets expensive very fast.

The second time at the range, after firing eighteen rounds of magnum ammo, the cylinder became almost impossible to open (It had been hard to open from the factory). I called S&W and they said, "send it back for evaluation." They sent me a packaging box and mailing label with a message saying they would schedule it for repair as soon as they got it and that it would come back in about a month.

It came back a month after I shipped it to them with a description of the repair made by the gunsmith. He said he shaved the forcing cone face and realigned the cylinder to the locking mechanism. It was much smoother to open and close, and the double-action pull was much better at a very smooth 9 lbs. I haven't fired it yet so I can't say it's 100% but it does feel almost as good as the Smith revolvers that I owned in the 70s and 80s. I'll Update once I get back to the range.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top