What might a ban look like? Respectful discussion please...

Status
Not open for further replies.

zip777

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
685
Reaction score
361
Posted this in another biker forum. Also wanted perspectives in a firearm forum. Keep it on task....

-----------------------

No doubt in my mind a ban of some sort is coming. I've read everything out there from "they're going to kick in your door" to "not much will happen"...

So what do YOU think a ban will look like?? Opinions on the question only please. Lets not bash each other over the head with second amendment arguments. We've kinda already done that. So....not what is needed...but what do you think will happen come January?? Respectful opinions please....

Go!
 
Register to hide this ad
I think 30 round AR-15 magazines will be banned and some sort of assault weapons ban...
 
Last edited:
I think the most likely outcome on the Federal level, failing all attempts at trying to appeal to logic and reason, is the reinstatement of the old Clinton-era "assault weapons ban" with a provision banning "high capacity" magazines and no sunset date. Ironically, current legally owned firearms that fit the description of the "ban" will have to be grandfathered in anyway as ex post facto laws are Constitutionally barred, which kind of defeats the whole purpose of reinstating said ban which is to remove those particular firearms from public circulation. In the end, all it will accomplish is create yet another scalper's market for "pre-ban" military pattern semi-auto rifles and their accessories.

Then again, I wouldn't put it past TPTB to use the same tortured logic they used to eviscerate the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments in order to get around that "limitation"... In fact, our current President is on record saying that he believes the U.S. Constitution to be a "flawed document." :rolleyes:
 
1.) Rifles like the AR15 banned. 2.) magazine capacities exceeding 10 rounds banned 3.) higher ammo tax 4.) extended period to actually take possession of purchased firearm. 5.) cessation of Internet ammo sales "Assault weapon" is a difficult term to define. People who want all guns banned would group many types of firearms under the definition of "assault weapon". Whatever happens, it will be an affront to the 2nd Amendment.
 
ITA that they will probably ban rifles like the AR-15 , M&P15 & magazines capacities not to exceed 10. So what's happening is my sons are running out and buying the 30 round capacity magazines before the ban. Me on the other hand, still can't make up my mind on any hand gun purchase. I'll only be choosing a revolver anyway and hopefully I'll never have to worry about a hand gun ban!
 
The original AWB listed several features of an assault weapon:
  • semi auto
  • detachable magazine
  • grenade launcher (22mm muzzle device)
  • flash hider
  • folding or telescopic stock
  • pistol grip
  • bayonet lug

Two of these "evil" features were allowed on "post ban" guns. Obviously, for an AR, the pistol grip and detachable magazine were required at the expense of the other features. The problem is, that was a different era and they almost couldn't get the bill passed. The tragedy in CT has the left salivating. They believe this is the perfect storm and that no crisis should go to waste, but should be used to drive their agenda. I would not be a bit surprised to see them go for a more restrictive law than the original AWB. For instance, what if they only allowed one "evil" feature? The Constitution doesn't seem to mean much to these people. :mad:
 
I'll only be choosing a revolver anyway and hopefully I'll never have to worry about a hand gun ban!

You realize that the left has been pushing general gun control for years. To them a defensive carry pistol is a "Saturday Night Special", a deer rifle is a "Sniper Weapon", and an AR is the ultimate evil. Your revolver is by no means safe. The intent is to divide and conquer, ban them all. Make no mistake about that.
 
Good responses so far and I'm in agreement with nearly all comments. Also wonder if the "grandfather clause" will prohibit you from passing down your firearm to a grown child etc.... You pass on they melt down the firearm. Face it. Unless you purchased an AR second hand with CASH they know you have it.
 
It may not even be a congressional ban. The ban may be in the form of an executive order, and could be draconian. There is nothing to protect us from such an EO. Congress has so far not acted on EOs, and the supreme court may do nothing. Several EOs have all ready been issued that are at best very questionable from a constitutional point of view and congress has done nothing. Only time will tell.
 
Even if the ban is an Executive Order which I believe it WILL be...I'm thinking current owners will not be effected. I think even Obama knows to enter homes and take what was legally purchased by law abiding citizens would have very very bad outcomes.

He could however say "take it outside your home and you can only carry 10 round mags". I could see them trying that.
 
I think that the old AWB will be re-instated at the least. It could be that there will be an attempt to stop owners of "assault rifles" from passing them onto their grown children. There might be an attempt to have all assault rifles made after a certain date (why? who the heck knows. politics) have to be registered under the NFA. Or something like that. Perhaps there will be an attempt to prohibit the 5.56/.225 - though I don't know how likely that is.

At the very least there will be a reinstatement of the AWB with a few more details added on. But it won't be an easy process for the anti's. I do believe that.

Despite all the ridicule being heaped on the NRA right now by the media and the anti's (very very similar to what happened in 99. The "experts" were saying then that the NRA was vulnerable and crippled after Colombine) the NRA and gunowners (members and non-members) won't just lie down and roll over. There were politicians who had A and B ratings from the NRA deserting us after Colombine as well. This fight has just begun.
 
I think that the old AWB will be re-instated at the least. It could be that there will be an attempt to stop owners of "assault rifles" from passing them onto their grown children. There might be an attempt to have all assault rifles made after a certain date (why? who the heck knows. politics) have to be registered under the NFA. Or something like that. Perhaps there will be an attempt to prohibit the 5.56/.225 - though I don't know how likely that is.

At the very least there will be a reinstatement of the AWB with a few more details added on. But it won't be an easy process for the anti's. I do believe that.

Despite all the ridicule being heaped on the NRA right now by the media and the anti's (very very similar to what happened in 99. The "experts" were saying then that the NRA was vulnerable and crippled after Colombine) the NRA and gunowners (members and non-members) won't just lie down and roll over. There were politicians who had A and B ratings from the NRA deserting us after Colombine as well. This fight has just begun.

With 8000 new NRA members joining a day people do believe in their rights.
 
I, too think there will be an "assault weapons" ban of some type.They will include a ban on high cap mags, and require registration of AR's, AK's, etc. Much the same as they did with the Streetsweeper years ago.
What say you. Will you "register"?

Ed
 
First, the banning of the manufacture and sale of "high capacity magazines". Then, a ban on the manufacture and sale of guns with the shoulder thing that goes up. Owners of these guns and mags will be "grandfathered in", and allowed to keep them... for a while. Private sales of firearms will then be required to submit to a background check (meaning registration). Heavy taxes on guns and ammo and reloading components could come at any time. "Assault weapons" will become non-transferable. When a gunowner dies, his black guns will become contraband, and must be relinquished to the authorities. Massive "gun buyback programs" will be put in place on a national level. Then, all gunowners will be required to be licensed, many, of course, will be rejected for licensing. Their guns--all of them-- will be required to be registered. Soon afterwards, the dreaded black guns and other "high capacity arms" will be outlawed once and for all, and they will be confiscated.

After all this, probably the United States will officially be under the control of the United Nations (or some other named NWO organization), and at some point, all privately owned arms will be banned and confiscated, with the same thing happening in all other countries under international control.

Along the way, some States MAY make feeble attempts to nullify and oppose some of the gun control (and many other tyrannies) coming from Washington and New York, but for the most part they won't actually DO anything about it. Eventually, one or two MIGHT even secede (but I doubt it), but they will quickly be forced into submission. Through all this, a FEW individuals and groups will actually resist and fight, most will be killed.

I believe all this will happen. No doubt in my mind. It's just a matter of time. Definitely within the next 50 years. Probably within the next 20.
 
Last edited:
This is the list I have seen so far, and theres more to add I'm sure... :(
Rifles (or copies or duplicates):

M1 Carbine

Sturm Ruger Mini-14

AR-15

Bushmaster XM15

Armalite M15

AR-10

Thompson 1927

Thompson M1

AK

AKM

AKS

AK-47

AK-74

ARM

MAK90

NHM 90

NHM 91

SA 85

SA 93

VEPR

Olympic Arms PCR

AR70

Calico Liberty

Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or DragunovSVU

Fabrique National FN/FAL

FN/LAR, or FNC

Hi-Point20Carbine

HK-91, HK-93

HK-94

HK-PSG-1

Thompson 1927 Commando

Kel-Tec Sub Rifle

Saiga

SAR-8

SAR-4800

SKS with detachable magazine

SLG 95

SLR 95 or 96

Steyr AU

Tavor

Uzi

Galil and Uzi Sporter

Galil Sporter or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz)

Pistols (or copies or duplicates):

Calico M-110

MAC-10

MAC-11

MPA3

Olympic Arms OA

TEC-9,

TEC-DC9,

TEC-22 Scorpion or AB-10

Uzi

Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):

Armscor 30 BG

SPAS 12 or LAW 12

Striker 12

Streetsweeper
Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):

A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,

(ii) a threaded barrel,

(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below),

(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than

10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).

A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has:

(i) a second pistol grip,

(ii) a threaded barrel,

(iii) a barrel shroud or

(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and

(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

A semiautomatic shotgun with:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,

(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),

(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and

(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.

Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”
 
All I see on the immediate horizon is one hell of a fight....

Unless the current transient in the white house wants to commit political suicide, he won't use a presidential decree.

If he does, after the mid-terms in 2014, he can plan on losing even more ground in house and perhaps even the senate. They remember what happened in 1994 & 1996.

If they pass anything at all it will be window-dressing and as in the past, it will be ineffective, leaving the door open for even more draconian measures in the future...

Drew
 
I think all hig cap. mags will be banned and AR type rifles will be as well..bottom line! I don't think the NRA will be able to do anything about it either.
 
Even if the ban is an Executive Order which I believe it WILL be...I'm thinking current owners will not be effected. I think even Obama knows to enter homes and take what was legally purchased by law abiding citizens would have very very bad outcomes.

He could however say "take it outside your home and you can only carry 10 round mags". I could see them trying that.

If they do it through executive order, it will get struck down faster than the ink will dry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top