michael1952
Member
pay 450.00 or so for a Taurus revolver and not pay a fair price for a S&W???? say 550.00-600.........i dont get it...guess they dont either
Last edited:
So why will people
- Thread starter michael1952
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Mickey D
Member
I guess the extra $100 is a lot of money to some folks.
OP
michael1952
Member
i guess and probably is for some
DeathGrip
US Veteran
Some people are just cheap.
I ain't made of money but I'd rather save up and buy a less attractive used S&W than a shiney new Taurus.
I ain't made of money but I'd rather save up and buy a less attractive used S&W than a shiney new Taurus.
manyguns
Member
If you aren't a real gun person you won't know the difference in the store. If 2 boxes of shells is your annual output you may be able to maintain the illusion.
What gets me is when people spend good money on a handgun, carry it in a junk holster on a Walmart belt then complain about it.
I disagree completely with your premise. A well used S&W isn't less attractive than a Taurus. In fact, it is much more attractive.
LittleCooner
Member
I think this is the answer, they do not know the difference, they just think "its a gun and it will go bang". Probably never tried to shoot a group on paper with a handgun in their life and think all guns are created equal. Guy behind the counter just wants to make a sale.
Arik
Member
They don't know the difference. ..or....they assume it's just as good as
Actually, the older Taurus revolvers are well made. I've had one for about 35 years and beat the snot out of it. I purchased it to shoot rats and train my dogs using blanks. I have a number of Smiths, including a newer one, so I have something to compare it to. I don't know what the new Taurus is like however, they could be junk for all I know.
Smith's have gone downhill in quality since the 80's but I still think they are a pretty good product. They are made in America also so that alone would get my money.
Smith's have gone downhill in quality since the 80's but I still think they are a pretty good product. They are made in America also so that alone would get my money.
DeathGrip
US Veteran
I disagree completely with your premise. A well used S&W isn't less attractive than a Taurus. In fact, it is much more attractive.
Well, If you're gonna put it that way.
I stand corrected.
OP
michael1952
Member
not bad mouthing Taurus at all ...just like he said as long as it goes bang and dont plan on shootin' 1000s of rounds, but you can find a nice smith of some kind for 450.00
mrrick
Member
Some people are "price" buyers and some people are "quality" buyers.
Ben_hutcherson
Member
I went through this about a year ago with a friend who wanted to buy a handgun(his first gun period)
He wanted a snub-nose revolver, but was dead-set on buying something new.
I took him to the range and let him shoot both my Detective's Special and my Chief's special. He was a natural with both, and was getting groups that many seasoned shooters would be proud of within a half an hour.
After shooting several guns at the range, he decided he preferred a "service size" revolver(he shot my DAO heavy barrel 64, as well as my 4" Trooper 357), which unfortunately is something that a lot of retailers don't stock new in anything but Taurus/Rossi and Rock Island. He dismissed a new GP-100 as it was too expensive, and he was pretty stuck at $500 or so max.
We were at Cabelas when he was shopping. I took him back into the Gun Library and had them pull a model 15(not sure of the dash number, but was not pinned) as well as a 4" 19-4 out of the case. The 15 was a little over $400, and the 19 about $550.
He was still dead-set on buying something new, however. It was at least looking at S&W snubs, although pretty much the only thing new in his ballpark were airweights. Since he had no immediate plans to CC and was looking at it primarily for home defense, I tried to suggest to him that this might not be the best choice.
The last I heard, he did indeed buy a Taurus. After shooting my guns(as well as another friends' guns who came along on the range trip) he was sold on the better quality of S&W and Colt(he shot everything from 1920s to 1990s production, as I don't currently have a newer S&W), but again refused to buy a used gun.
To each their own, but I can't help but think a used S&W would have been a better choice.
He wanted a snub-nose revolver, but was dead-set on buying something new.
I took him to the range and let him shoot both my Detective's Special and my Chief's special. He was a natural with both, and was getting groups that many seasoned shooters would be proud of within a half an hour.
After shooting several guns at the range, he decided he preferred a "service size" revolver(he shot my DAO heavy barrel 64, as well as my 4" Trooper 357), which unfortunately is something that a lot of retailers don't stock new in anything but Taurus/Rossi and Rock Island. He dismissed a new GP-100 as it was too expensive, and he was pretty stuck at $500 or so max.
We were at Cabelas when he was shopping. I took him back into the Gun Library and had them pull a model 15(not sure of the dash number, but was not pinned) as well as a 4" 19-4 out of the case. The 15 was a little over $400, and the 19 about $550.
He was still dead-set on buying something new, however. It was at least looking at S&W snubs, although pretty much the only thing new in his ballpark were airweights. Since he had no immediate plans to CC and was looking at it primarily for home defense, I tried to suggest to him that this might not be the best choice.
The last I heard, he did indeed buy a Taurus. After shooting my guns(as well as another friends' guns who came along on the range trip) he was sold on the better quality of S&W and Colt(he shot everything from 1920s to 1990s production, as I don't currently have a newer S&W), but again refused to buy a used gun.
To each their own, but I can't help but think a used S&W would have been a better choice.
Brian41
Member
I agree it's all about the money and many will buy what's cheapest. I've owned three Taurus revolvers but all were guns that S&W didn't make. I had good luck with them and own one .41 snub still.
What many don't know either when it's time to sell or trade a Taurus doesn't bring in a lot of money usually.
What many don't know either when it's time to sell or trade a Taurus doesn't bring in a lot of money usually.
Most of my shooter friends would not waste any amount of money on a Taurus. I do note that Taurus items spend much more time in the case that other companies in the many shops I frequent…
Case in point one big shop has had a .45 LG.Colt Taurus available for sale for over 15 months now.
Case in point one big shop has had a .45 LG.Colt Taurus available for sale for over 15 months now.
MOONDAWG
US Veteran
I own a variety of different brands of firearms including selections from Taurus & Charter arms that no else makes a comparable product to.
I don't go along with gun snobbery nor bigotry towards folks either. If one doesn't like a particular brand, don't buy it; but by the same token don't belittle those who do.
I've had S&W's, Rugers & GLOCKs "break". Those I couldn't replace parts on were returned to the factory for repairs.
Anything manmade can and will break, if it were not so they'd be no Rolex or Rolls-Royce repair centers.
I don't go along with gun snobbery nor bigotry towards folks either. If one doesn't like a particular brand, don't buy it; but by the same token don't belittle those who do.
I've had S&W's, Rugers & GLOCKs "break". Those I couldn't replace parts on were returned to the factory for repairs.
Anything manmade can and will break, if it were not so they'd be no Rolex or Rolls-Royce repair centers.
muzzleblast
Member
S&W Coulda, Shoulda...
I've gotta agree with Moondawg and Brian41 on this. I have a lot of S&Ws, but these fill a niche for me:
K-frame sized, 5 shot, 45 Colt snubbie:
K-frame sized, 5 shot 44 Special snubbie:
Another K-frame sized, 5 shot 44 Special:
Looong barreled .218 Bee:
Heavy duty 454 Casull:
MB
I've gotta agree with Moondawg and Brian41 on this. I have a lot of S&Ws, but these fill a niche for me:
K-frame sized, 5 shot, 45 Colt snubbie:
K-frame sized, 5 shot 44 Special snubbie:
Another K-frame sized, 5 shot 44 Special:
Looong barreled .218 Bee:
Heavy duty 454 Casull:
MB
Last edited:
I don't call it snobbery. I have what I think are very valid reasons for owning only S&W, Ruger, and Colt handguns.
I don't own Glocks because (1) I believe they are dangerous (2) I don't like polymer and (3) they are butt ugly.
I don't own Taurus because, compared to post-war through about 1980 S&Ws, the triggers are atrocious. From personal observation, they aren't nearly as well made as S&W revolvers of that vintage.
I don't buy new S&Ws because I like pinned barrels and I don't like the lock. The only exception is the NL442 I bought for my daughter. The only non-pinned Smith I own is a 651 .22 mag, and I don't believe they made that model in a pinned version. I made the decision several years back to not buy non-pinned Smiths not only because I believe the workmanship of that era is better, but also because it serves to limit the amount of money I spend.
All that said, I believe Taurus, Charter, High Point, etc. are very viable options for those on a tight budget, and truly can't afford the more expensive options.
There is nothing snobbish about any of this, is there? Opinionated and open to criticism, sure.
I don't own Glocks because (1) I believe they are dangerous (2) I don't like polymer and (3) they are butt ugly.
I don't own Taurus because, compared to post-war through about 1980 S&Ws, the triggers are atrocious. From personal observation, they aren't nearly as well made as S&W revolvers of that vintage.
I don't buy new S&Ws because I like pinned barrels and I don't like the lock. The only exception is the NL442 I bought for my daughter. The only non-pinned Smith I own is a 651 .22 mag, and I don't believe they made that model in a pinned version. I made the decision several years back to not buy non-pinned Smiths not only because I believe the workmanship of that era is better, but also because it serves to limit the amount of money I spend.
All that said, I believe Taurus, Charter, High Point, etc. are very viable options for those on a tight budget, and truly can't afford the more expensive options.
There is nothing snobbish about any of this, is there? Opinionated and open to criticism, sure.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Power Pistol in .38 +P loads...357 Magnum brass, 357 Magnum pistol?
- Latest: amir_fabrizzio
-