Drone Mystery?

Ματθιας;142126254 said:
Yeah, it's not like the .gov and mockingbird media hasn't ever conspired and lie to the American people. No, they'd NEVER do that! Right!?

I don't think it's so much that upper government sets out to lie, but they do seem unable to say the words "We don't know". They couldn't bring themselves to say those words when Covid hit, and they can't say those words now. There's a weird psychology that infects upper government, they seem have it in their heads that they must be all-knowing because they have those positions, and they can never admit to not being all-knowing. Hence they play pathetic word games like "there's no evidence the drones are from a hostile nation", rather than just saying "we don't know and we're trying to figure out what to do".
 
I don't think it's so much that upper government sets out to lie, but they do seem unable to say the words "We don't know". They couldn't bring themselves to say those words when Covid hit, and they can't say those words now. There's a weird psychology that infects upper government, they seem have it in their heads that they must be all-knowing because they have those positions, and they can never admit to not being all-knowing. Hence they play pathetic word games like "there's no evidence the drones are from a hostile nation", rather than just saying "we don't know and we're trying to figure out what to do".

It's not just our government. I've gotten the stink eye from coworkers for saying, "I don't know". Saying it out loud has become unacceptable in Western society as it implies a lack of control.

I've ranted about this before.

Saying "I don't know". A philosophical rant.
 
Last edited:
We've had satellites in orbit for decades whose cameras can zero in on a Russian soldier in Siberia making a pit stop behind a tree...you think they can't zero in on these things?

Look up the terms "radar horizon", "ground clutter", "radar angels", and "moving target indicator". Discriminating drones from the rest of the universe is not that easy.
 
It's not just our government. I've gotten the stink eye from coworkers for saying, "I don't know". Saying it out loud has become unacceptable in Western society as it implies a lack of control.

My father was once on a hiring board that was interviewing a recent college graduate. One of the questions my father asked was, "If you were working on a fence and needed some bailing wire, where would you go to get it?" His answer? "I don't know. Back home if we needed bailing wire we just went out back of the barn and found a piece to use." Other candidates BSed their way through similar questions. Guess who got the job?
 
For all those people in past drone threads that want to shoot them down. I came up with the perfect ammo with the help of Photoshop.

DRONE%203-XL.jpg
 
Apparently some mystery drones are now appearing in CA and CT skies. Still no good explanations from DHS, FBI, and DOD.
 
Last edited:
There's video of high powered commercial laser pointers, the kind you can buy online, bringing them down. It might melt the light weight plastic or interfere with the electronics.
 
Ματθιας;142126649 said:
You mean to tell me the most technically advanced .government on the planet doesn't know what's going on with the drone situation!? Right.

It's not only that they don't have the full story, but it's also that there are major problems in dealing with the issue. That's what they are afraid of admitting, because it implies no control. If you knew anything about the difficulties of detecting small, low flying objects, you would know why they don't know.
 
It's not only that they don't have the full story, but it's also that there are major problems in dealing with the issue. That's what they are afraid of admitting, because it implies no control. If you knew anything about the difficulties of detecting small, low flying objects, you would know why they don't know.

How do you know they don't have the full story?

How do you know they don't, in fact, know what's going on?

How do you know all of that?

Can you provide some links so I view them with skepticism, please.

Again, these are the same agencies, who've lied to you in the past.
 
If these drones are legal to fly, according to WH spokesperson, then why aren't they registered with the FAA? If they are were we should be able to find out their flight plans and reason for flying. Do you really trust the government telling you the truth?

essentially, we are in the same territory as RC model airplanes with this.
flight plans?!?! We're not taking a hop in a Cessna Citation to Denver here.
 
It's not only that they don't have the full story, but it's also that there are major problems in dealing with the issue. That's what they are afraid of admitting, because it implies no control. If you knew anything about the difficulties of detecting small, low flying objects, you would know why they don't know.

Some of them should be pretty easy to shoot down when they can be seen with the naked eye.
 
Those NJ Drones look the same even when they turn around 180°?

Palindrone !
Drones sighted today, flying over some NJ Navy facility. No reports that I have seen actually state what these things look like, or if they show up on radar. That is highly suspicious.
 
Ματθιας;142126682 said:
How do you know they don't have the full story?

How do you know they don't, in fact, know what's going on?

How do you know all of that?

Can you provide some links so I view them with skepticism, please.

Again, these are the same agencies, who've lied to you in the past.

I have a technical background in the subject. Anyone that tells you that all governments can see everything that approaches their shores at all times using radar is blowing smoke up you know where.

Don't take my word on it. Look up the terms "radar horizon", "ground clutter", "radar angels", and "moving target indicator limitations". Discriminating drones from the rest of the universe is not easy.
 
I have a technical background in the subject. Anyone that tells you that all governments can see everything that approaches their shores at all times using radar is blowing smoke up you know where.

Don't take my word on it. Look up the terms "radar horizon", "ground clutter", "radar angels", and "moving target indicator limitations". Discriminating drones from the rest of the universe is not easy.

With respect, that's not what I asked you.

What i asked was;

How do you know they don't have the full story?

How do you know they don't, in fact, know what's going on?

How do you know all of that?

The fact that the .gov reps are saying they don't know what they are, but that we shouldn't worry about. Please. Both can't be true.

Whatever the .gov says the opposite is probably true.
 
Two weeks ago, there was barely a word mentioned in the news media even though this has been going on in NJ since mid Nov.
Last week, there was credible info that a drone crashed on the mountain behind my house by Round Valley Reservoir. My street was packed with cars and State police as a helicopter surveyed the reservoir area with a light. Apparently nothing was found, but the incident was never reported by local or State media. Since then, the number of sightings has risen dramatically in the State and because of sheer numbers, it has become front page headlines.
What do we know at this point? Fact, absolutely nothing.
What have State and Federal government agencies concluded with respect to the public's understanding and safety? Fact, absolutely nothing.
Everything you hear, be it Iran, China,............whatever, are the baseless, unsubstantiated claims of the uninitiated public. What is shameful, is that our own agencies have failed in their most basic duties and left the general public to speculate on their own devices.
 
Last edited:
Ματθιας;142126787 said:
With respect, that's not what I asked you.

What i asked was;

How do you know they don't have the full story?

How do you know they don't, in fact, know what's going on?

How do you know all of that?

The fact that the .gov reps are saying they don't know what they are, but that we shouldn't worry about. Please. Both can't be true.

Whatever the .gov says the opposite is probably true.

I know they don't have the full story, because it is technically impossible for them to surveil the country in the kind of detail needed to spot drones everywhere with the assets currently available. To do so you would be looking at a small radar of some type on just about every cell tower in the country, and knowing the patchy cell coverage out here, that would still leave gaps. Even then, the discrimination issue remains. Is your radar seeing a drone, a car, an extractor fan, or a bird?

All the above assumes that everything being reported is actually a drone. I don't believe more than 2% are drones at all, if the percentage were less it would not surprise me at all. The one they were showing on TV last night was clearly an airliner throttled back on approach to an airport, so it wasn't making much noise. People are notoriously bad witnesses when it comes to identifying flying things in poor light, especially if the object has lights on it. Then there is the matter of size. If you've ever watched any of the monster hunt shows they have show tests where they ask people to judge the size of an unfamiliar shape at an unknown distance. Very few get close..

As for the government messaging, that's an issue I'm not qualified to comment on in any depth. I'm not a psychiatrist or social science major, just an observer of human nature.
 
Some of them should be pretty easy to shoot down when they can be seen with the naked eye.

What with? Under what circumstances? Do you know what is under the drone? If your projectile(s) miss do you know on what they will land?

Consider that a laser guided APKWS* missile weighs 32 lbs and a good chunk of it will come down intact after the warhead goes. How's that going to work on your new roof?

*The APKWS is currently in use in Ukraine as an anti-drone weapon.
Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System - Wikipedia
 

Latest posts

Back
Top