rkrcpa
Member


I have a couple with bobbed hammers, never had any issues with either one.
What's your vector, victor? It's a rotating mass, the math is beyond me. I'm not getting how you distinguish energy from momentum, which is….energy.Energy is mass times velocity squared, but energy is not the important factor. Energy is expended in many ways, noise, friction heat, etcetera. The important thing in force transfer from the hammer to the primer is momentum, mass times velocity. Momentum is also the critical factor in wound ballistics. Energy is always a much flashier number because of that squaring of the velocity but total kinetic energy dissipates in many ways
I would just buy a bobbed replacement hammer. Keep the original hammer.I'm interest in this also. I will be bobbing the hammer on my Fitz build..
Hmmm. Got me to thinking. I have a pre model 30 hand ejector in 32 S&W long. Thought about doing the same. It sounds as if yours held up ok. Any problems or concerns you would share ?I am in the camp of why cut the hammer down, when you can buy a 42 series with no hammer for about what it will cost for the gunsmithing involved.
Now if you have a cosmetically challenged snubby then it may be a canidate for bobbing and whatever. I have a 31-1 that is so challenged. I reamed the 32 S&W chambers to .32 H&R Magnum. Do I feel bad for doing so? No, since it was not a collector piece as it sat. I bought it in this condition just to try the conversion. I am pleased with it.
Bottom line is it is your piece, so do whatever you want.
I had an M60, purchased new in 1980, It had a bobbed hammer for many years only because I dropped the gun and part of the hammer spur broke off, so I had what was left bobbed. It always functioned fine, but the bobbed hammer served no real purpose. I eventually had a gunsmith install a new hammer.I bobbed the hammer on a model 60 years ago along with an action job. Eventually I traded it to another gunsmith who trusted his wife's life to it. They fired a lot of ammo through it with no problems.
BTM; momentum is not energy. Rotating masses have angular momentum, you will need some understanding of that if you want to evaluate revolver hammer/tumbler behaviorWhat's your vector, victor? It's a rotating mass, the math is beyond me. I'm not getting how you distinguish energy from momentum, which is….energy.
Makes no difference to most as long as the revolver fires with 100% reliability.BTM; momentum is not energy. Rotating masses have angular momentum, you will need some understanding of that if you want to evaluate revolver hammer/tumbler behavior
Having been a gunsmith in NYC at the time NYPD authorized the Model 60 with a DA only bobbed hammer, I have VERY direct experience with the topic. The answer is, DON"T. Your reasoning is correct. To compensate for the reduced mass of the hammer, S&W increased the hammer spring pressure and subsequently had hammer pin failures. If you want a DA only, snag free J frame, get a 640 or a 649. (personally, I have the 649.)I'm curious... I'm considering having a full action job done on a Model 60, including having the hammer bobbed. It's been my understanding for many years that the weight (mass) of the hammer in its original configuration adds to the successful ignition of the primer. Seems to me (intellectualizing here) that having the action job accomplished AND having the hammer bobbed may be counterproductive to successful ignition. Whaddaya think? Anybody have any real experience in this regard?