Knightrider03m
Member
Why the 9 and not the .40?
Because who ever make the choice on guns is a very smart person.
Why the 9 and not the .40?
ultra45, any change in the M&P9/9c status?
S&W recently won the BATFE contract, beating out Glock and Sig. Sig filed a protest when they got kicked out for a lack of reliability and some of the paperwork may shed light on the NYPD situation.
The BATFE testing involved both full size and compact models (the agents get one of each). A portion of Sigs protest (after they whined about an excessive emphasis upon reliability) dealt with perceived remedial actions allowed to S&W. BATFE countered, noting that a compact weapon experienced a number of malfunctions, but that the tester self diagnosed the cause as shooter induced and requested that the backstrap be changed on her weapon. When that was done by the test proctor, malfunctions ceased. Since that was an adjustment to suit the weapon to the shooter (required part of the weapons specification) rather than actual mechanical adjustment to the weapon, that was within the testing protocol.
Perhaps that's the issue with NYPD, as noted by some earlier, thumbs in the wrong place, which backstrap changes can correct (sometimes-others the grip has to change).
From what I have heard it all boils down to an ammo problem. They are seeing functioning problems only with the compact and our service ammo. S&W says its too dirty causing the problems, as I believe other ammo is digested w/o any problems. The job is not going to change ammo, it happens to be an excellent round. S&W and the range are working out the problem.
In the real world, any other department would adopt the service pistol and wait for the fix of the off duty (compact), but this is the NYPD....need we say more.......
To their credit, S&W does a great job, as does Glock (for the most part) addressing problems. Sig on the otherhand is not so Dept friendly. They were dropped once by the NYPD and only came back after changing their tune and addressing the depatments concerns with their product.
On a side note, after extensive testing, ATF ditched the M&P's and went with the Gen 4 Glock's
Isn't the Speer 124 grain Gold Dot the same ammo that "the job" had the terrible "triple feed" or whatever it was called with the Glock 19 Service Pistol? Instead of just switching to ammo that works (there are plenty of other choices that are proven performers on the street), didn't they have Glock come down to Rodman's Neck or wherever, set up shop in a trailer and commence using machine tools such to modify the Glock 19? Wouldn't this whole issue be resolved if "the job" would just change ammo? What an easy fix made ridiculous by a bureaucracy hampered by "committee thinking" rather than common sense.