- Joined
- Feb 3, 2015
- Messages
- 1,356
- Reaction score
- 1,572
Another factor is we often tend to look at the past through rose colored glasses, remembering the good and forgetting the bad. The good old days usually are not as good as we remember.QC issues with S&W are nothing new. Before the internet there was little means of letting the world know of such problems...companies such as S&W simply repaired them under warranty and no one was the wiser.
A few years ago I would have told that that while my S&W 41 is extremely picky about ammo it never had a serious problem. Until I was going through old gun boxes, opened the one my 41 came in 30+ years before and found the letter I wrote describing how the gun locked up solid on its second magazine before I sent it back to be repaired under warranty. The factory repaired the gun quickly and my memory of that had faded away being replaced with memories of home much I have enjoyed shooting it since then.
S&W does ship more defective guns now than they used to. But guns leaving the factory with defects is nothing new and not restricted to S&W. Over the past 40 years I have had to ship handguns from Browning, S&W, Springfield, Sig and Taurus back to the factory for repair. And that does not include guns that came with a defect I decided to live with or fixed myself. Maybe I should have expected to send that Taurus 22 revolver back to factory 3 times but I consider the other manufacturers on that list good companies.
We should hold S&W responsible when they ship a defective gun and its OK to complain about it. If people start hearing so many complaints about QA issues that it starts hurting sales maybe they will address them. After that one Taurus revolver I bought 35 years ago I have never bought another Taurus and never will. Gun enthusiasts are known for holding grudges. Once a gun maker gets a reputation for poor quality its really hard to regain the gun buying community's trust.