2017: Colt's re-entry into the revolver market

Based on what I've seen, the K6S blows the new Cobra out of the water in every category, at least on paper. The Colt might cost a bit less, I would rather save up and buy the higher quality piece.

Too little, too late, Colt.

There are a untold number of brand loyalist who will buy it just because it's got a little pony stamped on it somewhere.

Also, not everyone is about saving up for quality, hence why Taurus stays in business.
 
Well I have a older model Dick special and a shrouded Cobra (both .38s and in great condition) and will have them both with me went I check out the "new" Colts. It might turn out to be a interesting visit at the LGS.:)
 
Here's a question, and I don't mean to cause a fuss:

Will Colt's re-emergence in the DA revolver put even more pressure on S&W to rethink the internal lock? Here's my reasoning.

There are already quite a few S&W fans who only buy the older S&W's. I'm sure some folks buy Rugers based on the IL on the Smiths as well. Now that Colt is making their revolvers (without any IL), I'm sure there will be even more lost business.

If Colt makes a mid-frame .357 magnum with 3 and 4 inch barrels, this could be the nail in the coffin for the IL.

any thoughts on that one?
 
American 1776 - - those are some very interesting thought (I had the same ones myself) ! Hopefully you will be correct!! If this sells, I'd bet soon a 3" and 4" will follow.

Sheepdawg: I saw the 25 OZ. (I believe my vintage Dick Spl.comes in at around 21 or 22 OZ. with wood grips) but a good part of it might be the relatively larger & heavier grips. I believe the Rubbers weigh a bit more than the old fashioned wood did. The grips can be replaced and thus weight is shaved off.

John Fugate: Yes, I was late to the prom.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps Colt wanted to start with an all steel revolver so as to ensure long term durability and to appeal to the 'purists' who prefer an all steel revolver. 25 ounces for a 38+p is a great balance of shootability and carry-ease. Go much lighter, and people won't like shooting it.

I know I'd buy it in steel, but not in aluminum.
 
I'll keep my '70's Charter Arms Undercover. If Colt had really decided to come out with something more carryable and in an option of calibers, I might consider it, but I really don't expect anything dramatically new to come out of the factory. They never were progressive and looks like they never will be. Apparently they really have no R&D.
 
Speaking of being late for the prom , http://smith-wessonforum.com/firear...2017-colts-re-entry-into-revolver-market.html We have already compiled 3 pages of expert nonsense commentary on this little gem. :D

I have never claimed to be an expert, but I admit to stating that I didn't think this would ever happen.

I didn't know that in order to have an opinion, You needed to be an expert, well now I know, thanks for the lesson, hope I can be as smart as you some day!
 
Here's a question, and I don't mean to cause a fuss:

Will Colt's re-emergence in the DA revolver put even more pressure on S&W to rethink the internal lock? Here's my reasoning.

There are already quite a few S&W fans who only buy the older S&W's. I'm sure some folks buy Rugers
based on the IL on the Smiths as well. Now that Colt is making their revolvers (without any IL), I'm sure there will be even more lost business.

If Colt makes a mid-frame .357 magnum with 3 and 4 inch barrels, this could be the nail in the coffin for the IL.

any thoughts on that one?

I check out the LGS on a regular basis looking for Smith's I want. I have noticed more people here also doing that and it has raised the prices some what of the older NL revolvers!:eek: Talked to a few people and they are very interested in the new Colts, and will check out the Kimber

I also bought a Ruger LCR.38 and have been carrying it. It fits well in my pocket in a holster and does not print ''gun" Its only slightly wider than my S&W bodyguard .380. I think its only going to be a short time till the little non lock Ruger will be my only casual carry CCW up here in the boonies!. Going to the cities I will still carry a bigger.45 ISWB!
 
I wonder - Does this mean they'll offer revolver repair service for the older Colts?

A few moons back I was involved in a discussion over at the 1911 forum regarding Colt's bankruptcy and why, and how, and what could/should be done. You know, internet conversations right?! :)

Anyway, a member over there made a statement that Colt apparently sold all their revolver machinery and tooling to overseas in order for them to come up with some cash.

Sounds plausible, but if that's true then they'll probably not offer any services on the older models. I sure hope so but I doubt it.

He also said that Colt has only a handful of old school gunsmith's that can actually work on the older Colt revolvers.

Colt has more issues than just money and I do hope with the right management choices they'll come back to the consumer market as a stable company with great products and customer service.
 
I'm nonplussed at the naysayers, most of whom are not privy to the internal marketing research of Colt.

For years people bemoaned the lack of a Colt DA revolver. Now that it's coming, many (not all) are writing it off before they have even touched one.

Good for Colt. Another choice for consumers. I hope it sells well.
 
If Colt makes a mid-frame .357 magnum with 3 and 4 inch barrels, this could be the nail in the coffin for the IL.

I don't know about how it would relate to the IL, but I do feel that there's a market (however small) for a revolver the size you mention. Especially with a 3" tube and round butt, like a K-frame.

Then again, we all may be delusional because we have an interest in revolvers. This is not going to outsell Shields and Glock 43s.
 
I don't know about how it would relate to the IL, but I do feel that there's a market (however small) for a revolver the size you mention. Especially with a 3" tube and round butt, like a K-frame.

Then again, we all may be delusional because we have an interest in revolvers. This is not going to outsell Shields and Glock 43s.

To better explain: Any high quality revolver WITHOUT a lock will take business away from S&W's IL revolvers. The more non-IL options, the worse it gets for S&W.

This Cobra model will no doubt capture some who would have bought a J-frame with a lock, but now will get the Cobra instead.

If Colt brings back the Trooper with 3-6 inch barrels, the 686 series with IL's will suffer, since those who would have reluctantly bought the 686 with IL will now flock to the Colt option.

It's true that revolvers are not as popular as the polymer autos. However, it's also true that Colt is bringing back their Cobra, Ruger is coming out with a GP100 in .44 spl. and an 8-shot .357, and S&W is releasing their combat magnums with 2.75'' barrels---revolvers seem to be making a big difference in the profits of companies.
 
There are a untold number of brand loyalist who will buy it just because it's got a little pony stamped on it somewhere.

Also, not everyone is about saving up for quality, hence why Taurus stays in business.

I agree with you on both points, Colt will likely easily sell every Cobra they make. I'm happy anytime someone brings out a new revolver, maybe the increased competition will keep prices down on the items I really want.
 
Back
Top