See post #25.
LOL nvm then!
See post #25.
About 15 years ago I spent many flight hours tracking migrating endangered species from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall , back north in the spring. Logged about 1,000 hours flying variety of single engine aircraft ...
I thought at the time I was collecting data on Whooping Cranes. I know now that they were Whooping Yokes the whole time.
All that work , for nothing.
Excellent Magger!
About 15 years ago I spent many flight hours tracking migrating endangered species from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall , back north in the spring. Logged about 1,000 hours flying variety of single engine aircraft ...
I thought at the time I was collecting data on Whooping Cranes. I know now that they were Whooping Yokes the whole time.
All that work , for nothing.
That's one that never gets enough exposure and there's actually 3 choices:
Magazine
clip
and en blanc clip
While it hasn’t been proven, there is a theory that the clip-magazine confusion actually started with the M1 Garand. U.S. soldiers first heavily used the rifle in World War II. The M1 Garand uses "en blanc" clips to load rounds into an internal magazine.
The use of "clip" for "magazine" is perfectly acceptable. Look it up.
Definition of clip (Entry 2 of 4)
1: any of various devices that grip, clasp, or hook
2: a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles
also : a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm
3: something (such as a piece of jewelry) that is worn as an ornament or fastener and that is held in position by a clip
Language is dynamic. It changes over time to reflect common usage. If enough people use "clip" for magazine the definitions will change. To those that argue otherwise I ask...why aren't you speaking Old English?
Acceptability is an opinion and does not relate to correctness.
The source you quote is too simpleton and generic, not authoritative, and therefore the greatest source of the confusion. Likely written by and/or for the lame stream media or readers that do not really care or want to know an accurate answer. The forum is no place for that.
You good with Remington’s opinion?
And because of that packaging, Remington went bankrupt.![]()
And because of that packaging, Remington went bankrupt.![]()
Acceptability is an opinion and does not relate to correctness.
The source you quote is too simpleton and generic, not authoritative, and therefore the greatest source of the confusion. Likely written by and/or for the lame stream media or readers that do not really care or want to know an accurate answer. The forum is no place for that.
Look it up. But I'm sure you can't be bothered. It's from Webster's. Maybe you don't recognize them as an authority but more people recognize them than the opinions of gun forum members.
But since you did not reply in Old English I can only assume you recognize that language changes over time.
Look it up. But I'm sure you can't be bothered. It's from Webster's. Maybe you don't recognize them as an authority but more people recognize them than the opinions of gun forum members.
But since you did not reply in Old English I can only assume you recognize that language changes over time.
Couple of points: the number of people agreeing on a point has noting to do with whether the point is valid or not;
Secondly, look at the audience. Dictionary entries reflect usage, not correctness. Any number of people with no knowledge of the subject may use terms incorrectly- in any subject matter.
Does that incorrect usage tend to clarify or obfuscate the subject? For example, I have guns that take magazines, and I have guns that take en bloc clips. Are they interchangeable? See?
Words have meanings- and incorrect usage makes those meanings useless. I see that everyday.