Minor rant about cylinder terms

About 15 years ago I spent many flight hours tracking migrating endangered species from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall , back north in the spring. Logged about 1,000 hours flying variety of single engine aircraft ...
I thought at the time I was collecting data on Whooping Cranes. I know now that they were Whooping Yokes the whole time.

All that work , for nothing.
 
About 15 years ago I spent many flight hours tracking migrating endangered species from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall , back north in the spring. Logged about 1,000 hours flying variety of single engine aircraft ...
I thought at the time I was collecting data on Whooping Cranes. I know now that they were Whooping Yokes the whole time.

All that work , for nothing.

At least you can face up to it.

:)
 
About 15 years ago I spent many flight hours tracking migrating endangered species from Wisconsin to Florida in the fall , back north in the spring. Logged about 1,000 hours flying variety of single engine aircraft ...
I thought at the time I was collecting data on Whooping Cranes. I know now that they were Whooping Yokes the whole time.

All that work , for nothing.

But you still got payed I'll bet.
 
That's one that never gets enough exposure and there's actually 3 choices:
Magazine
clip
and en blanc clip

While it hasn’t been proven, there is a theory that the clip-magazine confusion actually started with the M1 Garand. U.S. soldiers first heavily used the rifle in World War II. The M1 Garand uses "en blanc" clips to load rounds into an internal magazine.

The use of "clip" for "magazine" is perfectly acceptable. Look it up.

Definition of clip (Entry 2 of 4)
1: any of various devices that grip, clasp, or hook
2: a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles
also : a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm
3: something (such as a piece of jewelry) that is worn as an ornament or fastener and that is held in position by a clip

Language is dynamic. It changes over time to reflect common usage. If enough people use "clip" for magazine the definitions will change. To those that argue otherwise I ask...why aren't you speaking Old English?
 
The use of "clip" for "magazine" is perfectly acceptable. Look it up.

Definition of clip (Entry 2 of 4)
1: any of various devices that grip, clasp, or hook
2: a device to hold cartridges for charging the magazines of some rifles
also : a magazine from which ammunition is fed into the chamber of a firearm
3: something (such as a piece of jewelry) that is worn as an ornament or fastener and that is held in position by a clip

Language is dynamic. It changes over time to reflect common usage. If enough people use "clip" for magazine the definitions will change. To those that argue otherwise I ask...why aren't you speaking Old English?

Acceptability is an opinion and does not relate to correctness.

The source you quote is too simpleton and generic, not authoritative, and therefore the greatest source of the confusion. Likely written by and/or for the lame stream media or readers that do not really care or want to know an accurate answer. The forum is no place for that.
 
Acceptability is an opinion and does not relate to correctness.

The source you quote is too simpleton and generic, not authoritative, and therefore the greatest source of the confusion. Likely written by and/or for the lame stream media or readers that do not really care or want to know an accurate answer. The forum is no place for that.

You good with Remington’s opinion?
 

Attachments

  • 879DD0E9-22A8-4764-998C-2CF8D08845EE.jpg
    879DD0E9-22A8-4764-998C-2CF8D08845EE.jpg
    59.5 KB · Views: 38
Acceptability is an opinion and does not relate to correctness.

The source you quote is too simpleton and generic, not authoritative, and therefore the greatest source of the confusion. Likely written by and/or for the lame stream media or readers that do not really care or want to know an accurate answer. The forum is no place for that.

Look it up. But I'm sure you can't be bothered. It's from Webster's. Maybe you don't recognize them as an authority but more people recognize them than the opinions of gun forum members.

But since you did not reply in Old English I can only assume you recognize that language changes over time.
 
Look it up. But I'm sure you can't be bothered. It's from Webster's. Maybe you don't recognize them as an authority but more people recognize them than the opinions of gun forum members.

But since you did not reply in Old English I can only assume you recognize that language changes over time.

Couple of points: the number of people agreeing on a point has noting to do with whether the point is valid or not;

Secondly, look at the audience. Dictionary entries reflect usage, not correctness. Any number of people with no knowledge of the subject may use terms incorrectly- in any subject matter.
Does that incorrect usage tend to clarify or obfuscate the subject? For example, I have guns that take magazines, and I have guns that take en bloc clips. Are they interchangeable? See?
Words have meanings- and incorrect usage makes those meanings useless. I see that everyday.
 
Look it up. But I'm sure you can't be bothered. It's from Webster's. Maybe you don't recognize them as an authority but more people recognize them than the opinions of gun forum members.

But since you did not reply in Old English I can only assume you recognize that language changes over time.

it's not the bother, it's the apples and oranges thing. I do think Websters is an authority and fine source; on language. But my point is, not a source for specialized firearms terms, that's all I'm trying to communicate.

We've come to recognize that not even gun manufacturers were scholarly and most of what we read is from their marketing depts. So not even they are "term" correct. And not all members come to this forum to be scholarly which is perfectly fine. As long as we know the difference. I will always share the most correct established info I'm aware of, I'm not always correct, and most of all I'm not the 'term police' nor wish to be.
 
Couple of points: the number of people agreeing on a point has noting to do with whether the point is valid or not;

Secondly, look at the audience. Dictionary entries reflect usage, not correctness. Any number of people with no knowledge of the subject may use terms incorrectly- in any subject matter.
Does that incorrect usage tend to clarify or obfuscate the subject? For example, I have guns that take magazines, and I have guns that take en bloc clips. Are they interchangeable? See?
Words have meanings- and incorrect usage makes those meanings useless. I see that everyday.

Very well said.

“Majority is not always right." The fact that many people are in support of a wrong thing does not make the thing right. After all, the number of persons who with poor reasoning capacity is far higher than those with better reasoning capacity.
 
We do, however, need to remind ourselves not to get too dogmatic about “correctness”. Most gun terms mean something else in the real (non-gun) world and have been imported and assigned a gun-related meaning by someone who was not an “authority”, just the first.

Take yoke and crane, two terms assigned by different companies to the same thing, which have very different non-gun meanings.

And then there is magazine. On the front counter of the school library where I worked some years back there was a basket with a sign “Old magazines”. I was always tempted to toss one of my surplus 1911 mags in there when nobody was watching and observe the resulting commotion when the librarian noticed it. I decided I needed the job too much to risk it ;)
 
Back
Top